You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The current implementation always infers the noise. The option to not do that and instead provide a determinstic noise-sigma (as common in likelihood functions) is missing.
IMO this could be implemented by just skipping the update equations 21-22 (or 30-31 for multiple noises). Then, in the remaining update equations, the noise is only used as "scale x shape" which corresponds to the mean of this distribution, which could be provided instead.
Discussion:
Are my thoughts correct?
The free energy terms include the noise shape and noise scale separately. How to handle that?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The current implementation always infers the noise. The option to not do that and instead provide a determinstic noise-sigma (as common in likelihood functions) is missing.
IMO this could be implemented by just skipping the update equations 21-22 (or 30-31 for multiple noises). Then, in the remaining update equations, the noise is only used as "scale x shape" which corresponds to the mean of this distribution, which could be provided instead.
Discussion:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: