New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Apache SIS #435
Merged
Merged
Apache SIS #435
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This was
linked to
issues
Apr 7, 2022
bchapuis
force-pushed
the
apache-sis
branch
6 times, most recently
from
April 10, 2022 09:10
b25060e
to
8e2c046
Compare
SonarCloud Quality Gate failed. |
SonarCloud Quality Gate failed. 0 Bugs |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR integrates Apache SIS to read different file formats including shapefiles. On this basis, it should now be possible to import all the necessary data with a pipeline written in Java.
@Drabble I would be interested in having your thoughts about the Pipeline class in the core module. For now, I use CompletableFutures and runnables to declare the steps of the pipeline. I feel that the pipeline should have two levels: one for declaring tasks (e.g. runnables); one for processing data (e.g. with streams).