Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

better Dockerfile #56

Open
SuperSandro2000 opened this issue May 23, 2019 · 3 comments · May be fixed by #57
Open

better Dockerfile #56

SuperSandro2000 opened this issue May 23, 2019 · 3 comments · May be fixed by #57

Comments

@SuperSandro2000
Copy link

Are you interested in a better more up to date and slimer Dockerfile? I am currently building one and would contribute it if you like.
@gaul
Copy link
Collaborator

gaul commented May 23, 2019

Definitely. We would also appreciate documentation improvements!

@SuperSandro2000
Copy link
Author

SuperSandro2000 commented May 23, 2019 •
edited

So far I have it at ~9MB. I don't know if I missed some dependencies or packages. The image consist out of a single statically compiled go binary and https certificates would be generated on host os and mounted as a volume. I still want to apply some tweaks to it and do proper testing if something broke. Then I update the docs to reflect the changes and maybe do an arm variant.

@gaul
Copy link
Collaborator

gaul commented May 24, 2019

Great! Here are some current statistics:

https://microbadger.com/images/andrewgaul/compy

@SuperSandro2000 SuperSandro2000 linked a pull request May 24, 2019 that will close this issue
Open
@lolobosse lolobosse mentioned this issue Feb 17, 2020
Open
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

Docker redo SuperSandro2000/compy
2 participants
@gaul @SuperSandro2000