You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Mar 8, 2020. It is now read-only.
Explicitly state the style guide because writing C/C++ without a clear style guide is a nightmare
Since the only sane style guide I know is GC++SG I propose to adopt it, though it will require renaming struct names and header guards and reordering function arguments (at least).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
We are already using google style guide, we should make it explicit in the README though.
Could you point an example of the problems you have already noticed?
I propose two things here:
Explicitly state the style guide because writing C/C++ without a clear style guide is a nightmare
Since the only sane style guide I know is GC++SG I propose to adopt it, though it will require renaming struct names and header guards and reordering function arguments (at least).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: