Two addresses for the same parcel: 588 Cedar Pl, Duncan, BC and 588 Cedar Ave, Duncan, BC

[mraross]

@mraross commented on Fri May 05 2017

588 Cedar Pl and 588 Cedar Ave occupy the same parcel.

---

@mraross commented on Fri May 05 2017

---

@mraross commented on Fri May 05 2017

In the screenshot above, 588 Cedar Pl and 588 Cedar Ave occupy the same parcel. They came from two different sources. One of them is wrong.

---

@cmhodgson commented on Fri May 05 2017

Can you think of a way we would programmatically tell the difference between this and for example your favorite, the Central Building, with valid addresses on 4 streets spanning 3 parcels?

---

@mraross commented on Fri May 05 2017

The civic numbers are identical in this case. In general, the cases are:

1. Same civic numbers and suffixes, different something else.

   • worth looking into

2. Different civic numbers and suffixes, same everything else.

   • probably ok

3. Different everything.

   • worth looking into

---

@cmhodgson commented on Fri May 05 2017

We could potentially consider developing an address range QA process that put the points onto the parcel fabric and pointed out all of the potential issues.

[alixcote]

Need to look at the data sources. Needs further investigation.

[alixcote]

Update: BC Assessment has done their review, and reported back that they have confirmed with the City of Duncan that the correct address is 588 Cedar Avenue. Pending update from AddressBC.