Merge of consolidated cutblocks and VRI

[FrankBornais]

The merge for consolidated cutblocks and VRI is not in the script , it says it's in a separate script, can we have acces to this script as well?

[Jake-Bradshaw]

@Karine-Pigeon, the comment in script 4 below makes me think that this step was done manually in GIS. Appendix A in the report references (incorrectly) script 4a when detailing how VRI age was updated with consolidated cutblock age. We do not have a 4a and it seems like script 4, which we do have, does that step.

SSGBM-VRI-BEM/Python_Scripts/04_Add_LUT_age_classes_to_VRI_with_Consolidated_Cutblocks_VRIxBEM_2020.py

Lines 19 to 22 in a930c9d

	# Dependencies : VRI feature class must contain the following fields: "BCLCS_LEVEL_1", "PROJ_AGE_CLASS_CD_1",
	# "HARVEST_DATE", "FID_Consolidated_Cutblock_Clip","HARVESTYR_CC" (these last two fields are created
	# through an intermediate step using the Consolidated Cut Blocks data and the VRI. It is not part of
	# this script at this point.) Make sure to double check the harvest year values for the consolidated

Appendix A in the report references:
CCL
Input
Consolidated cutblock layer (CCL) was used to enhance the representation of recent harvesting in VRI (i.e., where VRI indicated a forest was old, but the CCL indicated it had been harvested the polygon age was updated to reflect the CCL data).
Script
Script4a was run to incorporate any changes in age class data based on the projected age and consolidated cut block information. The CCL harvest date took precedence over the VRI harvest date.

[FrankBornais]

Handled in new function merge_ccb_on_vri