Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

investigate using a lighter weight rx library than rxjs #8

Open
bcherny opened this issue Jan 30, 2018 · 4 comments
Open

investigate using a lighter weight rx library than rxjs #8

bcherny opened this issue Jan 30, 2018 · 4 comments
Labels
exploration

Comments

@bcherny
Copy link
Owner

bcherny commented Jan 30, 2018

No description provided.

@bcherny bcherny self-assigned this Jan 30, 2018
@IzumiSy
Copy link
Contributor

IzumiSy commented Feb 13, 2018 •
edited

Kefir and Most might come into an alternative

https://kefirjs.github.io/kefir/
https://github.com/cujojs/most

@martaver
Copy link

Just read that rxjs 6 will be 10x smaller, if that helps.

@timjacobi
Copy link

How about supporting multiple and shipping a default like cycle.js does?

@bcherny bcherny mentioned this issue May 3, 2018
Closed
@bcherny bcherny removed their assignment Jul 2, 2018
@skovhus
Copy link

skovhus commented Dec 26, 2018

How about supporting multiple and shipping a default like cycle.js does?

I like that approach.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
exploration
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
5 participants
@IzumiSy @skovhus @bcherny @timjacobi @martaver