Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

BEAKL 19bis #4

Closed
hasufell opened this issue Feb 20, 2021 · 7 comments
Closed

BEAKL 19bis #4

hasufell opened this issue Feb 20, 2021 · 7 comments

Comments

@hasufell
Copy link

Where is it from?

The link leads to a reddit thread that doesn't show much info on it or who authored it.

@bclnr
Copy link
Owner

bclnr commented Mar 2, 2021

I have no idea. That's the only source I could find.
I only added it after it was mentioned on that thread, and surprisingly it gave very good results.

Unfortunately the website that hosted most of the info and discussions around "BEAKL" variants is down ( https://ieants.cc/ ). The only sources I can find on those efforts are http://thedarnedestthing.com/ and https://deskthority.net/wiki/BEAKL , but they don't seem to contain that particular layout.

@bclnr
Copy link
Owner

bclnr commented Mar 2, 2021

If anyone has more information, or more similar layouts that are worth evaluating, please feel free to post.

@sunaku
Copy link
Contributor

sunaku commented Apr 7, 2021

Update: Upon RTFM, I now understand that it's an unused key with a default French character. 😅

What is the second é character (between apostrophe and period) on the left-hand bottom row?

# q y o u z w d n c k #
- h i e a , g t r s p ;
è j ' é . x v m l f b #

Is it supposed to be a / slash? because that's the only other character that seems to be missing.

@bclnr
Copy link
Owner

bclnr commented Apr 8, 2021

Right, it's an unused key.
And since I'm particularly interested in typing French, I put the "é" on there to get better results. If you don't care about French you can ignore it or replace it with whatever character you want.

Maybe including French characters on unused keys is misleading for other people though. Not sure what to do about it.

@sunaku
Copy link
Contributor

sunaku commented Apr 8, 2021

I think that is fine since it's explained in the README. 👍 I have another question: what is the significance of bis?

The original Reddit post doesn't mention it, so I wonder what it means and whether it's an official BEAKL variant.

@bclnr
Copy link
Owner

bclnr commented Apr 16, 2021

Not, it's not an official BEAKL variant.
The Reddit thread I linked gave a variant of BEAKL 19 saying "a new layout with identical configuration rules as BEAKL 19, but where the letters 'EAT' are preset to specific keys". So I understand the person just generated a layout and didn't give it a name.
That's also why it was really unexpected for me to see it perform so well.

I just called it "bis" to say it's a variant of it. It means "twice" in latin I think: it's used in some places to designate a second thing with the same name, like 2 buildings with the same address.

@iandoug
Copy link

iandoug commented Apr 28, 2021

I have no idea. That's the only source I could find.
I only added it after it was mentioned on that thread, and surprisingly it gave very good results.

Unfortunately the website that hosted most of the info and discussions around "BEAKL" variants is down ( https://ieants.cc/ ). The only sources I can find on those efforts are http://thedarnedestthing.com/ and https://deskthority.net/wiki/BEAKL , but they don't seem to contain that particular layout.

Den has disappeared.
His repo is at https://bitbucket.org/Shenafu/keyboard-layout-analyzer/src/master/

I've put a mirror of his KLATest at https://klatest.keyboard-design.com/#/main ... it has the other variants he made. That 19bis is not included .. I didn't see it before here. Besides we tended to focus on English mainly.

Cheers, Ian

@bclnr bclnr closed this as completed Aug 22, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants