You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Would you be interested to add support for https://johannesbuchner.github.io/UltraNest/ ?
The interface should be very similar to dynesty.
UltraNest is a very reliable tuning-parameter-free algorithm. It can be faster than dynesty, especially if you take advantage of vectorization.
It also supports resuming from disk and MPI parallelisation, if that is useful to you.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi @JohannesBuchner, yes that would be great. If the API is close to dynesty it shouldn't be too difficult, the main tasks being a wrapper to run the fit (in prospect.fitting.nested), a task to make the output -- samples, weights, etc. -- writable in the standard format (in prospect.io.write_results), and adding command line arguments to support UltraNest options.
I don't have time to put this together at the moment, but would be happy to review a PR.
Would you be interested to add support for https://johannesbuchner.github.io/UltraNest/ ?
The interface should be very similar to dynesty.
UltraNest is a very reliable tuning-parameter-free algorithm. It can be faster than dynesty, especially if you take advantage of vectorization.
It also supports resuming from disk and MPI parallelisation, if that is useful to you.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: