Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

how does this compare to equihash? #3

Open
stef opened this issue Aug 9, 2023 · 1 comment
Open

how does this compare to equihash? #3

stef opened this issue Aug 9, 2023 · 1 comment

Comments

@stef
Copy link

stef commented Aug 9, 2023

https://www.internetsociety.org/sites/default/files/blogs-media/equihash-asymmetric-proof-of-work-based-generalized-birthday-problem.pdf a PoW system that is cheap to verify on the server and also memory hard? I'm author of https://github.com/stef/equihash/ - also funded by ngi0 - but in PET...

@bddap
Copy link
Owner

bddap commented Aug 9, 2023

That top link 404s.

Looks like essential difference is that equihash is purportedly bottlenecked by memory (neat!), while this pow crate uses sha256, which is not.

The pow crate also provides some abstractions to make it easy to do pow on certain rust types without the caller needing to think too much about serialization, more of a ux thing.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants