split perform_uh in 3

[montanier]

I have an evaluation scheme that does not fit simply in one function. As a consequence, it was pretty difficult to realize the reevaluation of the solutions. I have split perform_uh in three:

• select the candidates to reevalute
• reevaluate the candidates
• set the new values to the solutions.

This allow me to use my own tools to perform the reevaluation and give the results back to the libcmaes. I have verify that my modification does not brake perform_uh by using the test_functions utility.

[beniz]

Thanks, looks good to me: more flexibility does not hurt.

If you have an example to share, and possibly the underlying reasons that make an evaluation scheme interleave with the uncertainty handling procedure, it would be interesting I think.

[montanier]

True, that would help to understand and show the possibilities of the lib.
Currently my code using the libcmaes requires too many external elements to
be a good example. I will add that as soon as I have the time to do
something small and clear.

On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 5:23 PM, Emmanuel Benazera notifications@github.com
wrote:

Thanks, looks good to me: more flexibility does not hurt.

If you have an example to share, and possibly the underlying reasons that
make an evaluation scheme interleave with the uncertainty handling
procedure, it would be interesting I think.

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#139 (comment).