Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

netrw's long listing is preferred to tree listing #70

Closed
benknoble opened this issue Jul 25, 2017 · 0 comments
Closed

netrw's long listing is preferred to tree listing #70

benknoble opened this issue Jul 25, 2017 · 0 comments
Assignees
Milestone

Comments

@benknoble
Copy link
Owner

Expected Behavior

I think rather than use the tree-like listing, I'd prefer the long listing. That is, :e . should produce a listing similar to ls -l.

Current Behavior

:e . gives a tree-listing, where <CR> on a directory toggles it rather than enters it.

Possible Solution

let g:netrw_liststyle=1

Context

I don't like being unable to fully enter a directory and isolate it's contents. Further, the long listing provides better information than thin.

Your Environment

  • Version used (e.g. Dotfiles 1.0 or commit 7c102b6): Dotfiles commit 5db4ddf
  • Operating System and version (e.g. OS X 10.11.6): OS X 10.11.6
  • CLI used (e.g. Terminal): Terminal
  • Version info of relevant software (e.g. Vim): Vim 8.0.740
@benknoble benknoble added the vim label Jul 25, 2017
@benknoble benknoble added this to the Version 1.1 milestone Jul 25, 2017
@benknoble benknoble self-assigned this Jul 25, 2017
@benknoble benknoble modified the milestones: Version 1.1, Version 1.2 Jul 30, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant