We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
I think rather than use the tree-like listing, I'd prefer the long listing. That is, :e . should produce a listing similar to ls -l.
:e .
ls -l
:e . gives a tree-listing, where <CR> on a directory toggles it rather than enters it.
<CR>
let g:netrw_liststyle=1
I don't like being unable to fully enter a directory and isolate it's contents. Further, the long listing provides better information than thin.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
b2537a7
benknoble
No branches or pull requests
Expected Behavior
I think rather than use the tree-like listing, I'd prefer the long listing. That is,
:e .
should produce a listing similar tols -l
.Current Behavior
:e .
gives a tree-listing, where<CR>
on a directory toggles it rather than enters it.Possible Solution
Context
I don't like being unable to fully enter a directory and isolate it's contents. Further, the long listing provides better information than thin.
Your Environment
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: