-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 728
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Automation framework detected by pixelscan #324
Comments
@prescience-data yes that would be a good one to add. Although I'm not sure it's causing it in this case. |
Ok, I've finally found the reason. If I disable Web gl is related to another issue, not pixel scan. TS probably uses 2.6.1 which fails due to the bug. I think you can close this issue since 2.6.0 passes the test. |
@trnj can you check my previous comment and see if it works with 2.6.1 + my PR applied? |
Still the same on 2.6.1, even with proposed fix. Without iframe.contentWindow passes the test. |
Looking forward to see the PR with the fix @trnj |
The following
This would fix the problem with iframe redirect and the plugin will pass this test out of the box. |
You can add it yourself through a pull request :) |
PR @ #327, closing this |
New PR: #341 |
hey guys ,
any idea how can pixelscan.net detect my puppeteer even with stealth on?
http://prntscr.com/uhs1aq
This is a sample of the code:
`const puppeteer = require('puppeteer-extra');
Is it possible to add/modify more variables manually to make the browser even less detectable?
thank you!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: