Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Performance cannot approach as mention #18

Open
tonyli0803 opened this issue Mar 20, 2019 · 0 comments
Open

Performance cannot approach as mention #18

tonyli0803 opened this issue Mar 20, 2019 · 0 comments

Comments

@tonyli0803
Copy link

hi @bfortuner , I' m interested in your pytorch_tiramisu.

I use the train.ipynb as the backbone to train the model. However, I cannot approach the performance as you do.

My FC-DenseNet67 result converge at 0.8357994871794872.

It will be appreciate to help me figure out my questions.
Here are my questions:

  1. The origin code doesn't have weighted loss function. The weighted loss function do improve
    iou, but harm to pixel accuracy. How did you get those weight?

  2. I see some past issue mention that the train.ipynb is slightly different from the original train
    code. Do you add a lot of things on it? Can you send me the original code for further
    comparison ?

Here is the modification from the code :

in train.ipynb

  1. N_EPOCHS -> 1000

  2. To use multi-gpu I add this line

image

  3. To implement "exclude the 'background' class" , I add this lines. Try to set 11 class, and 
      ignore void label loss

image

   4.  I train it directly. I didn't not finetune.

image

Please help me figure out these questions.🙏🙏🙏🙏🙇🙇🙇
My email is : tonyli0803@gmail.com

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant