-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 11
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
More flexibility on operators #27
Comments
Also, even if it is not really related... The 'bool' type filter, should be also translatable 😉 |
Hi, I will add List Filters features in future but not sure above the Multiple condition and filter slot which is complexed and its very advanced features. For now i am focusing on other required basic features and i have other task in my list already. so will think about after all my task list completed. |
Sorry, but do you know more or less when you can get the list options done? This is an idea of how it could be done:
And this is how the bool option could be more flexible:
|
It would be great if we could filter by more operators.
Heare are some examples/ideas.
in_list: ['Bascom', 'Coultervillle']
not_in_list: ['Bascom', 'Coultervillle']
for that the columnProps object could depend on a "options" list (or even better a callback function that does an api call to the backend on demand)
Another cool idea would be to support multiple conditions by each filter. Take prime vue for inspiration:
https://primevue.org/datatable/#advanced_filter
If the prior options seem like too much trouble, another option might just give the possibility to make a slot for the filter menu and allow there to modify the filter conditions
Thanks for the package!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: