-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 24
/
alpha.cljc
1135 lines (980 loc) · 40.1 KB
/
alpha.cljc
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
692
693
694
695
696
697
698
699
700
701
702
703
704
705
706
707
708
709
710
711
712
713
714
715
716
717
718
719
720
721
722
723
724
725
726
727
728
729
730
731
732
733
734
735
736
737
738
739
740
741
742
743
744
745
746
747
748
749
750
751
752
753
754
755
756
757
758
759
760
761
762
763
764
765
766
767
768
769
770
771
772
773
774
775
776
777
778
779
780
781
782
783
784
785
786
787
788
789
790
791
792
793
794
795
796
797
798
799
800
801
802
803
804
805
806
807
808
809
810
811
812
813
814
815
816
817
818
819
820
821
822
823
824
825
826
827
828
829
830
831
832
833
834
835
836
837
838
839
840
841
842
843
844
845
846
847
848
849
850
851
852
853
854
855
856
857
858
859
860
861
862
863
864
865
866
867
868
869
870
871
872
873
874
875
876
877
878
879
880
881
882
883
884
885
886
887
888
889
890
891
892
893
894
895
896
897
898
899
900
901
902
903
904
905
906
907
908
909
910
911
912
913
914
915
916
917
918
919
920
921
922
923
924
925
926
927
928
929
930
931
932
933
934
935
936
937
938
939
940
941
942
943
944
945
946
947
948
949
950
951
952
953
954
955
956
957
958
959
960
961
962
963
964
965
966
967
968
969
970
971
972
973
974
975
976
977
978
979
980
981
982
983
984
985
986
987
988
989
990
991
992
993
994
995
996
997
998
999
1000
(ns expound.alpha
"Generates human-readable errors for `clojure.spec`"
(:require [expound.problems :as problems]
[clojure.spec.alpha :as s]
[clojure.string :as string]
[clojure.set :as set]
[expound.printer :as printer]
[expound.util :as util]
[expound.ansi :as ansi]))
;;;;;; registry ;;;;;;
(defonce ^:private registry-ref (atom {}))
;;;;;; internal specs ;;;;;;
(s/def ::singleton (s/coll-of any? :count 1))
(s/def :expound.spec/spec keyword?)
(s/def :expound.spec/specs (s/coll-of :expound.spec/spec))
(s/def :expound.spec.problem/via (s/coll-of :expound.spec/spec :kind vector?))
(s/def :expound.spec/problem (s/keys :req-un [:expound.spec.problem/via]))
(s/def :expound.spec/problems (s/coll-of :expound.spec/problem))
(s/def :expound.printer/show-valid-values? boolean?)
(s/def :expound.printer/value-str-fn ifn?)
(s/def :expound.printer/print-specs? boolean?)
(s/def :expound.printer/theme #{:figwheel-theme :none})
(s/def :expound.printer/opts (s/keys
:opt-un [:expound.printer/show-valid-values?
:expound.printer/value-str-fn
:expound.printer/print-specs?
:expound.printer/theme]))
(s/def :expound.spec/spec (s/or
:set set?
:pred ifn?
:kw qualified-keyword?
:spec s/spec?))
;;;;;; themes ;;;;;;
(def ^:private figwheel-theme
{:highlight [:bold]
:good [:green]
:good-pred [:green]
:good-key [:green]
:bad [:red]
:bad-value [:red]
:error-key [:red]
:focus-key [:bold]
:correct-key [:green]
:header [:cyan]
:footer [:cyan]
:warning-key [:bold]
:focus-path [:magenta]
:message [:magenta]
:pointer [:magenta]
:none [:none]})
;;;;;; private ;;;;;;
(def ^:private check-header-size 45)
(def ^:private header-size 35)
(def ^:private section-size 25)
(def ^:private ^:dynamic *value-str-fn* (fn [_ _ _ _] "NOT IMPLEMENTED"))
(s/fdef value-in-context
:args (s/cat
:opts map?
:spec-name (s/nilable #{:args :fn :ret ::s/pred})
:form any?
:path :expound/path
:value any?)
:ret string?)
(defn ^:private value-in-context
"Given a form and a path into that form, returns a string
that helps the user understand where that path is located
in the form"
[opts spec-name form path value]
(binding [*print-namespace-maps* false]
(cond
(= :fn spec-name)
(printer/indent (ansi/color (pr-str form) :bad-value))
(= form value)
(printer/indent (ansi/color (printer/pprint-str value) :bad-value))
;; FIXME: It's silly to reconstruct a fake "problem"
;; after I've deconstructed it, but I'm not yet ready
;; to break the API for value-in-context BUT
;; I do want to test that a problems-based API
;; is useful.
;; See https://github.com/bhb/expound#configuring-the-printer
path
(printer/indent (printer/highlighted-value opts
{:expound/form form
:expound/in path
:expound/value value}))
:else
(printer/format
"Part of the value\n\n%s"
(printer/indent (ansi/color (pr-str form) :bad-value))))))
(defn ^:private spec-str [spec]
(if (keyword? spec)
(printer/format
"%s:\n%s"
spec
(printer/indent (printer/pprint-str (s/form spec))))
(printer/pprint-str (s/form spec))))
;; via is different when using asserts
(defn ^:private spec+via [problem]
(let [{:keys [via spec]} problem]
(if (keyword? spec)
(into [spec] via)
via)))
(s/fdef specs
:args (s/cat :problems :expound.spec/problems)
:ret :expound.spec/specs)
(defn ^:private specs
"Given a collection of problems, returns the specs for those problems, with duplicates removed"
[problems]
(->> problems
(map spec+via)
flatten
distinct))
(defn ^:private specs-str [problems]
(->> problems
specs
reverse
(map spec-str)
(string/join "\n")))
(defn ^:private named? [x]
#?(:clj (instance? clojure.lang.Named x)
:cljs (implements? cljs.core.INamed x)))
(defn ^:private pr-pred* [pred]
(cond
(or (symbol? pred) (named? pred))
(name pred)
(fn? pred)
(printer/pprint-fn pred)
:else
(printer/elide-core-ns (binding [*print-namespace-maps* false] (printer/pprint-str pred)))))
(defn ^:private pr-pred [pred spec]
(if (= ::s/unknown pred)
(pr-pred* spec)
(pr-pred* pred)))
(defn ^:private show-spec-name [spec-name value]
(if spec-name
(str
(case spec-name
::s/pred "" ; Used in s/assert
:args "Function arguments\n\n"
:ret "Return value\n\n"
:fn "Function arguments and return value\n\n")
value)
value))
(defn ^:private preds [problems]
(->> problems
(map (fn [problem]
(printer/indent
(ansi/color
(pr-pred (:pred problem)
(:spec problem))
:good-pred))))
distinct
(string/join "\n\nor\n\n")))
(declare error-message)
(defn ^:private spec-w-error-message? [via pred]
(boolean (let [last-spec (last via)]
(and (not= ::s/unknown pred)
(qualified-keyword? last-spec)
(error-message last-spec)
(s/get-spec last-spec)))))
(defn ^:private label
([size]
(apply str (repeat size "-")))
([size s]
(label size s "-"))
([size s label-str]
(ansi/color
(let [prefix (str label-str label-str " " s " ")
chars-left (- (long size)
(count prefix))]
(->> (repeat chars-left label-str)
(apply str)
(str prefix)))
:header)))
(def ^:private header-label (partial label header-size))
(def ^:private section-label (partial label section-size))
(defn ^:private relevant-specs [problems]
(let [sp-str (specs-str problems)]
(if (string/blank? sp-str)
""
(printer/format
"%s\n\n%s"
(section-label "Relevant specs")
sp-str))))
(defn ^:private multi-spec-parts [spec-form]
(let [[_multi-spec mm] spec-form]
{:mm mm}))
(defn ^:private multi-spec [pred spec]
(->> (s/form spec)
(tree-seq coll? seq)
(filter #(and (sequential? %)
(<= 2 (count %))
(= ::s/multi-spec (keyword (first %)))
(= pred (second %))))
first))
(defn ^:private no-method [_spec-name _form _path problem]
(let [dispatch-val (last (:expound/path problem))
sp (s/spec (last (:expound/via problem)))
{:keys [mm]} (multi-spec-parts
(multi-spec (:pred problem) sp))]
;; It would be informative if we could print out
;; the dispatch function here, but I don't think we can reliably get it.
;; I would very much like to be wrong about this.
;;
;; Previously, I had misunderstood the purpose of the re-tag function.
;; but it is NOT used to invoke the multi-method. See
;; https://clojuredocs.org/clojure.spec.alpha/multi-spec#example-5b750e5be4b00ac801ed9e60
;;
;; In many common cases, re-tag will be a symbol that happens to be equal
;; to the dispatch function, but there is no guarantee. It's unfortunate to lose
;; information that could be useful in many common cases, but I think it's pretty
;; bad to display misleading information, even in rare cases.
;;
;; For CLJ, we might be able to do
;; (pr-str (.dispatchFn @(resolve mm)))
;; but I'm not sure that we can reliably resolve the multi-method symbol
;;
;; In any case, I'm fairly confident that for CLJS, we cannot resolve the symbol in
;; any context except the REPL, so we couldn't provide this message across implementations
;; (pr-str (dispatch-fn @(resolve mm)))
;;
;; Given the above, I think the safest thing to do is just not attempt to print the dispatch function.
(printer/format
" Spec multimethod: `%s`
Dispatch value: `%s`"
(pr-str mm)
(pr-str dispatch-val))))
(defmulti ^:no-doc problem-group-str (fn [type _spec-name _form _path _problems _opts] type))
(defmulti ^:no-doc expected-str (fn [type _spec-name _form _path _problems _opts] type))
(defmulti ^:no-doc value-str (fn [type _spec-name _form _path _problems _opts] type))
(defn ^:private expected-str* [spec-name problems opts]
(let [problem (first problems)
{:expound/keys [form in]} problem
type (:expound.spec.problem/type problem)]
(expected-str type spec-name form in problems opts)))
(defn ^:private value-str* [spec-name problems opts]
(let [problem (first problems)
{:expound/keys [form in]} problem
type (:expound.spec.problem/type problem)]
(value-str type spec-name form in problems opts)))
(defn ^:private conformed-value [problems invalid-value]
(let [conformed-val (-> problems first :val)]
(if (= conformed-val invalid-value)
""
(printer/format
"\n\nwhen conformed as\n\n%s"
(printer/indent (ansi/color (pr-str conformed-val) :bad-value))))))
;; FIXME - when I decide to break compatibility for value-str-fn, maybe
;; make it show conform/unformed value
(defn ^:private value+conformed-value [problems spec-name form path opts]
(let [{:keys [show-conformed?]} opts
invalid-value (if (nil? path)
;; This isn't used by default
;; because value-in-context will look at
;; path and only print form, but anyone
;; who provides their own *value-str-fn*
;; could use this
::no-value-found
(problems/value-in form path))]
(printer/format
"%s%s"
(*value-str-fn* spec-name form path invalid-value)
(if show-conformed?
(conformed-value problems invalid-value)
""))))
(defmethod value-str :default [_type spec-name form path problems _opts]
(show-spec-name spec-name (value+conformed-value problems spec-name form path {:show-conformed? true})))
(defn ^:private explain-missing-keys [problems]
(let [missing-keys (map #(printer/missing-key (:pred %)) problems)]
(str (printer/format
"should contain %s: %s"
(if (and (= 1 (count missing-keys))
(every? keyword missing-keys))
"key"
"keys")
(printer/print-missing-keys problems))
(if-let [table (printer/print-spec-keys problems)]
(str "\n\n" table)
nil))))
(def ^:private format-str "%s\n\n%s\n\n%s")
(defn ^:private format-err [header type spec-name form in problems opts expected]
(printer/format
format-str
(header-label header)
(value-str type spec-name form in problems opts)
expected))
(defmethod expected-str :expound.problem-group/one-value [_type spec-name _form _path problems opts]
(let [problem (first problems)
subproblems (:problems problem)
grouped-subproblems (vals (group-by :expound.spec.problem/type subproblems))]
(string/join
"\n\nor\n\n"
(map #(expected-str* spec-name % opts) grouped-subproblems))))
(defmethod value-str :expound.problem-group/one-value [_type spec-name _form _path problems opts]
(s/assert ::singleton problems)
(let [problem (first problems)
subproblems (:problems problem)]
(value-str* spec-name subproblems opts)))
(defn ^:private header [type]
(case type
:expound.problem/missing-spec
"Missing spec"
"Spec failed"))
(defmethod problem-group-str :expound.problem-group/one-value [type spec-name _form path problems opts]
(s/assert ::singleton problems)
(let [problem (first problems)
subproblems (:problems problem)
{:expound/keys [form in]} (first subproblems)]
(format-err (-> subproblems first :expound.spec.problem/type header)
type
spec-name
form
in
problems
opts
(expected-str type spec-name form path problems opts))))
(defmethod expected-str :expound.problem-group/many-values [_type spec-name _form _path problems opts]
(let [subproblems (:problems (first problems))]
(string/join
"\n\nor value\n\n"
(for [problem subproblems]
(printer/format
"%s\n\n%s"
(value-str* spec-name [problem] opts)
(expected-str* spec-name [problem] opts))))))
(defmethod problem-group-str :expound.problem-group/many-values [_type spec-name form path problems opts]
(s/assert ::singleton problems)
(printer/format
"%s\n\n%s"
(header-label "Spec failed")
(expected-str _type spec-name form path problems opts)))
(defmethod expected-str :expound.problem/missing-key [_type _spec-name _form _path problems _opts]
(explain-missing-keys problems))
(defmethod problem-group-str :expound.problem/missing-key [type spec-name form path problems opts]
(assert (apply = (map :val problems)) (str util/assert-message ": All values should be the same, but they are " problems))
(format-err "Spec failed"
type
spec-name
form
path
problems
opts
(expected-str type spec-name form path problems opts)))
(defmethod expected-str :expound.problem/not-in-set [_type _spec-name _form _path problems _opts]
(let [{:keys [expound/via]} (first problems)
last-spec (last via)]
(if (and (qualified-keyword? last-spec) (error-message last-spec))
(ansi/color (error-message last-spec) :good)
(let [combined-set (apply set/union (map :pred problems))]
(printer/format
"should be%s: %s"
(if (= 1 (count combined-set)) "" " one of")
(ansi/color (->> combined-set
(map #(str "" (pr-str %) ""))
(sort)
(map #(ansi/color % :good))
(string/join ", "))
:good))))))
(defmethod problem-group-str :expound.problem/not-in-set [type spec-name form path problems opts]
(assert (apply = (map :val problems)) (str util/assert-message ": All values should be the same, but they are " problems))
(format-err "Spec failed"
type
spec-name
form
path
problems
opts
(expected-str type spec-name form path problems opts)))
(defmethod expected-str :expound.problem/missing-spec [_type spec-name form path problems _opts]
(str "with\n\n"
(->> problems
(map #(no-method spec-name form path %))
(string/join "\n\nor with\n\n"))))
(defmethod value-str :expound.problem/missing-spec [_type spec-name form path _problems _opts]
(printer/format
"Cannot find spec for
%s"
(show-spec-name spec-name (*value-str-fn* spec-name form path (problems/value-in form path)))))
(defmethod problem-group-str :expound.problem/missing-spec [type spec-name form path problems opts]
(printer/format
"%s\n\n%s\n\n%s"
(header-label "Missing spec")
(value-str type spec-name form path problems opts)
(expected-str type spec-name form path problems opts)))
(defn ^:private lcs* [[x & xs] [y & ys]]
(cond
(or (= x nil) (= y nil)) nil
(= x y) (vec (cons x (lcs* xs ys)))
:else []))
(defn ^:private lcs [& paths]
(reduce
(fn [xs ys]
(lcs* xs ys))
paths))
(defn ^:private contains-alternate-at-path? [spec-form path]
(if (not (coll? spec-form))
false
(let [[op & rest-form] spec-form
[k & rest-path] path]
(condp contains? op
#{`s/or `s/alt} (let [node-keys (->> rest-form (apply hash-map) keys set)]
(cond
(empty? path) true
(contains? node-keys k) (some #(contains-alternate-at-path? % rest-path) rest-form)
:else false))
#{`s/keys `s/keys*} (let [keys-args (->> rest-form (apply hash-map))
node-keys (set (concat
(:opt keys-args [])
(:req keys-args [])
(map #(keyword (name %)) (:opt-un keys-args []))
(map #(keyword (name %)) (:req-un keys-args []))))
possible-spec-names (if (qualified-keyword? k)
[k]
(filter
#(= k
(keyword (name %)))
(flatten (vals keys-args))))]
(cond
;; path is ambiguous here, we don't know which they intended if
;; there are multiple-paths
(empty? path) false
(contains? node-keys k) (some #(contains-alternate-at-path? % rest-path)
(map s/form possible-spec-names))
:else false))
#{`s/cat} (let [node-keys (->> rest-form (apply hash-map) keys set)]
(cond
(empty? path) false
(contains? node-keys k) (some #(contains-alternate-at-path? % rest-path) rest-form)
:else false))
;; It annoys me that I can't figure out a way to hit this branch in a spec
;; and I can't sufficiently explain why this will never be hit. Intuitively,
;; it seems like this should be similar to 's/or' and 's/alt' cases
#{`s/nilable} (cond
(empty? path) true
(contains? #{::s/pred ::s/nil} k) (some
#(contains-alternate-at-path? % rest-path)
rest-form)
:else false)
(some #(contains-alternate-at-path? % path) rest-form)))))
(defn ^:private share-alt-tags?
"Determine if two groups have prefixes (ie. spec tags) that are included in
an s/or or s/alt predicate."
[grp1 grp2]
(let [pprefix1 (:path-prefix grp1)
pprefix2 (:path-prefix grp2)
shared-prefix (lcs pprefix1 pprefix2)
shared-specs (lcs (:via-prefix grp1) (:via-prefix grp2))]
(and (get pprefix1 (-> shared-prefix count))
(get pprefix2 (-> shared-prefix count))
(some #(and
(contains-alternate-at-path? (s/form %) shared-prefix)
(contains-alternate-at-path? (s/form %) shared-prefix))
shared-specs))))
(defn ^:private recursive-spec?
"Determine if either group 1 or 2 is recursive (ie. have repeating specs in
their via paths) and if one group is included in another."
[grp1 grp2]
(let [vxs (:via-prefix grp1)
vys (:via-prefix grp2)
vprefix (lcs vxs vys)]
(or (and (not= (count vys) (count (distinct vys)))
(< (count vprefix) (count vys))
(= vxs vprefix))
(and (not= (count vxs) (count (distinct vxs)))
(< (count vprefix) (count vxs))
(= vys vprefix)))))
(defn ^:private problem-group [grp1 grp2]
{:expound.spec.problem/type :expound.problem-group/many-values
:path-prefix (lcs (:path-prefix grp1)
(:path-prefix grp2))
:via-prefix (lcs (:via-prefix grp1)
(:via-prefix grp2))
:problems (into
(if (= :expound.problem-group/many-values
(:expound.spec.problem/type grp1))
(:problems grp1)
[grp1])
(if (= :expound.problem-group/many-values
(:expound.spec.problem/type grp2))
(:problems grp2)
[grp2]))})
(defn ^:private target-form? [form]
(and (map? form)
(not (sorted? form))
(contains? #{:expound.problem-group/many-values
:expound.problem-group/one-value}
(:expound.spec.problem/type form))
(= 1 (count (:problems form)))))
(defn ^:private groups-walk [f form]
(cond
(and (map? form)
(contains? #{:expound.problem-group/many-values
:expound.problem-group/one-value}
(:expound.spec.problem/type form))
(contains? form :problems))
(f (update form :problems #(into (empty %) (map (partial groups-walk f) %))))
:else form))
(defn ^:private lift-singleton-groups [groups]
(mapv (partial groups-walk #(if (target-form? %)
(first (:problems %))
%)) groups))
(defn ^:private vec-remove [v x]
(vec (remove #{x} v)))
(defn ^:private replace-group [groups old-groups group]
(-> groups
(vec-remove old-groups)
(conj (problem-group old-groups group))))
(defn ^:private conj-groups
"Consolidate a group into a group collection if it's either part of an s/or,
s/alt or recursive spec."
[groups group]
(if-let [old-group (first (filter #(or (recursive-spec? % group)
(share-alt-tags? % group))
groups))]
(replace-group groups old-group group)
(conj groups group)))
(defn ^:private groups [problems]
(let [grouped-by-in-path
(->> problems
(group-by :expound/in)
vals
(map (fn [grp]
{:expound.spec.problem/type :expound.problem-group/one-value
:path-prefix (apply lcs (map :expound/path grp))
:via-prefix (apply lcs (map :expound/via grp))
:problems grp})))]
(->> grouped-by-in-path
(reduce conj-groups [])
lift-singleton-groups)))
(defn ^:private problems-without-location [problems opts]
(let [failure nil
non-matching-value [:expound/value-that-should-never-match]
problems (->> problems
(map #(dissoc % :expound.spec.problem/type :reason))
(map #(assoc % :expound.spec.problem/type (problems/type failure % true)))
groups)]
(apply str (for [prob problems]
(let [in (-> prob :expound/in)]
(expected-str (-> prob :expound.spec.problem/type) :expound/no-spec-name non-matching-value in [prob] opts))))))
(defmethod expected-str :expound.problem/insufficient-input [_type _spec-name _form _path problems opts]
(let [problem (first problems)]
(printer/format
"should have additional elements. The next element%s %s"
(if-some [el-name (last (:expound/path problem))]
(str " \"" (pr-str el-name) "\"")
"")
(problems-without-location problems opts))))
(defmethod problem-group-str :expound.problem/insufficient-input [type spec-name form path problems opts]
(format-err "Syntax error"
type
spec-name
form
path
problems
opts
(expected-str type spec-name form path problems opts)))
(defmethod expected-str :expound.problem/extra-input [_type _spec-name _form _path problems _opts]
(s/assert ::singleton problems)
"has extra input")
(defmethod problem-group-str :expound.problem/extra-input [type spec-name form path problems opts]
(format-err "Syntax error"
type
spec-name
form
path
problems
opts
(expected-str type spec-name form path problems opts)))
(defmethod expected-str :expound.problem/fspec-exception-failure [_type _spec-name _form _path problems _opts]
(s/assert ::singleton problems)
(let [problem (first problems)]
(printer/format
"threw exception
%s
with args:
%s"
(printer/indent (if (string? (:reason problem))
(str "\"" (:reason problem) "\"")
(pr-str (:reason problem))))
(printer/indent (string/join ", " (:val problem))))))
(defmethod problem-group-str :expound.problem/fspec-exception-failure [type spec-name form path problems opts]
(format-err
"Exception"
type
spec-name
form
path
problems
opts
(expected-str type spec-name form path problems opts)))
(defmethod expected-str :expound.problem/fspec-ret-failure [_type _spec-name _form _path problems opts]
(s/assert ::singleton problems)
(let [problem (first problems)]
(printer/format
"returned an invalid value\n\n%s\n\n%s"
(ansi/color (printer/indent (pr-str (:val problem))) :bad-value)
(problems-without-location problems opts))))
(defmethod problem-group-str :expound.problem/fspec-ret-failure [type spec-name form path problems opts]
(format-err
"Function spec failed"
type
spec-name
form
path
problems
opts
(expected-str type spec-name form path problems opts)))
(defmethod value-str :expound.problem/insufficient-input [_type spec-name form path problems _opts]
(show-spec-name spec-name (value+conformed-value problems spec-name form path {:show-conformed? false})))
(defmethod value-str :expound.problem/extra-input [_type spec-name form path problems _opts]
(show-spec-name spec-name (value+conformed-value problems spec-name form path {:show-conformed? false})))
(defmethod value-str :expound.problem/fspec-fn-failure [_type spec-name form path problems _opts]
(show-spec-name spec-name (value+conformed-value problems spec-name form path {:show-conformed? false})))
(defmethod value-str :expound.problem/fspec-exception-failure [_type spec-name form path problems _opts]
(show-spec-name spec-name (value+conformed-value problems spec-name form path {:show-conformed? false})))
(defmethod value-str :expound.problem/fspec-ret-failure [_type spec-name form path problems _opts]
(show-spec-name spec-name (value+conformed-value problems spec-name form path {:show-conformed? false})))
(defmethod expected-str :expound.problem/fspec-fn-failure [_type _spec-name _form _path problems _opts]
(s/assert ::singleton problems)
(let [problem (first problems)]
(printer/format
"failed spec. Function arguments and return value
%s
should satisfy
%s"
(printer/indent (ansi/color (pr-str (:val problem)) :bad-value))
(printer/indent (ansi/color (pr-pred (:pred problem) (:spec problem)) :good-pred)))))
(defmethod problem-group-str :expound.problem/fspec-fn-failure [type spec-name form path problems opts]
(s/assert ::singleton problems)
(format-err
"Function spec failed"
type
spec-name
form
path
problems
opts
(expected-str type spec-name form path problems opts)))
(defmethod expected-str :expound.problem/check-fn-failure [_type _spec-name _form _path problems _opts]
(s/assert ::singleton problems)
(let [problem (first problems)]
(printer/format
"failed spec. Function arguments and return value
%s
should satisfy
%s"
(printer/indent (ansi/color (pr-str (:val problem)) :bad-value))
(printer/indent (ansi/color (pr-pred (:pred problem) (:spec problem)) :good-pred)))))
(defmethod problem-group-str :expound.problem/check-fn-failure [_type spec-name form path problems opts]
(s/assert ::singleton problems)
(printer/format
format-str
(header-label "Function spec failed")
(ansi/color (printer/indent (pr-str (:expound/check-fn-call (first problems)))) :bad-value)
(expected-str _type spec-name form path problems opts)))
(defmethod expected-str :expound.problem/check-ret-failure [_type _spec-name _form _path problems opts]
(problems-without-location problems opts))
(defmethod problem-group-str :expound.problem/check-ret-failure [_type spec-name form path problems opts]
(printer/format
"%s
%s
returned an invalid value.
%s
%s"
(header-label "Function spec failed")
(ansi/color (printer/indent (pr-str (:expound/check-fn-call (first problems)))) :bad-value)
(*value-str-fn* spec-name form path (problems/value-in form path))
(expected-str _type spec-name form path problems opts)))
(defmethod expected-str :expound.problem/unknown [_type _spec-name _form _path problems _opts]
(let [[with-msg no-msgs] ((juxt filter remove)
(fn [{:keys [expound/via pred]}]
(spec-w-error-message? via pred))
problems)]
(->> (when (seq no-msgs)
(printer/format
"should satisfy\n\n%s"
(preds no-msgs)))
(conj (keep (fn [{:keys [expound/via]}]
(let [last-spec (last via)]
(if (qualified-keyword? last-spec)
(ansi/color (error-message last-spec) :good)
nil)))
with-msg))
distinct
(remove nil?)
(string/join "\n\nor\n\n"))))
(defmethod problem-group-str :expound.problem/unknown [type spec-name form path problems opts]
(assert (apply = (map :val problems)) (str util/assert-message ": All values should be the same, but they are " problems))
(format-err
"Spec failed"
type
spec-name
form
path
problems
opts
(expected-str type spec-name form path problems opts)))
(defn ^:private instrumentation-info [failure caller]
(if (= :instrument failure)
(printer/format "%s:%s\n\n"
(:file caller "<filename missing>")
(:line caller "<line number missing>"))
""))
(defn ^:private spec-name [ed]
(if (#{:instrument} (::s/failure ed))
(cond
;; This works for clojure.spec <= 0.2.176
;; and CLJS <= 1.10.439
(::s/args ed)
:args
(::s/ret ed)
:ret
(::s/fn ed)
:fn
:else
;; for earlier versions
(-> ed ::s/problems first :path first))
nil))
(defn ^:private print-explain-data [opts explain-data]
(if-not explain-data
"Success!\n"
(let [explain-data' (problems/annotate explain-data)
{:expound/keys [caller form]
::s/keys [failure]} explain-data'
problems (->> explain-data'
:expound/problems
groups)]
(printer/no-trailing-whitespace
(str
(ansi/color (instrumentation-info failure caller) :none)
(printer/format
"%s%s\n%s %s %s\n"
(apply str
(for [prob problems]
(str
(problem-group-str (-> prob :expound.spec.problem/type)
(spec-name explain-data')
form
(-> prob :expound/in)
[prob]
opts)
"\n\n"
(let [s (if (:print-specs? opts)
(relevant-specs (:expound/problems
explain-data'))
"")]
(if (empty? s)
s
(str s "\n\n"))))))
(ansi/color (section-label) :footer)
(ansi/color "Detected" :footer)
(ansi/color (count problems) :footer)
(ansi/color (if (= 1 (count problems)) "error" "errors") :footer)))))))
(defn ^:private minimal-fspec [form]
(let [fspec-sp (s/cat
:sym qualified-symbol?
:args (s/*
(s/cat :k #{:args :fn :ret} :v any?)))]
(-> (s/conform fspec-sp form)
(update :args (fn [args] (filter #(some? (:v %)) args)))
(->> #?(:bb (identity)
:clj (s/unform fspec-sp)
:cljs (s/unform fspec-sp))))))
(defn ^:private print-check-result [check-result]
(let [{:keys [sym spec failure] :or {sym '<unknown>}} check-result
ret #?(:clj (:clojure.spec.test.check/ret check-result)
:cljs (or (:clojure.spec.test.check/ret check-result)
(:clojure.test.check/ret check-result)))
explain-data (ex-data failure)
bad-args (or #?(:clj (:clojure.spec.test.alpha/args explain-data)
:cljs (:cljs.spec.test.alpha/args explain-data))
(-> ret :shrunk :smallest first))
failure-reason (::s/failure explain-data)
sym (or sym '<unknown>)]
(str
;; CLJS does not contain symbol if function is undefined
(label check-header-size (str "Checked " sym) "=")
"\n\n"
(cond
;; FIXME - once we have a function that can highlight
;; a spec, use it here to make this error message clearer
#?(:clj (and failure (= :no-gen failure-reason))
;; Workaround for CLJS
:cljs (and
failure
(re-matches #"Unable to construct gen at.*" (.-message failure))))
(str
#?(:clj
(let [path (::s/path explain-data)]
(str
"Unable to construct generator for "
(ansi/color (pr-str path) :error-key)))
:cljs
(.-message failure))
" in\n\n"
(printer/indent (str (s/form (:args (:spec check-result)))))
"\n")
(= :no-args-spec failure-reason)
(str
"Failed to check function.\n\n"
(ansi/color (printer/indent (printer/pprint-str
(minimal-fspec (s/form spec)))) :bad-value)
"\n\nshould contain an :args spec\n")
(= :no-fn failure-reason)
(if (some? sym)
(str
"Failed to check function.\n\n"
(ansi/color (printer/indent (pr-str sym)) :bad-value)
"\n\nis not defined\n")
;; CLJS doesn't set the symbol
"Cannot check undefined function\n")
(and explain-data
(= :check-failed (-> explain-data ::s/failure)))
(with-out-str
(s/*explain-out* (update
explain-data
::s/problems
#(map
(fn [p]
(assoc p :expound/check-fn-call (concat (list sym)
bad-args)))
%))))
failure
(str
(ansi/color (printer/indent (printer/pprint-str
(concat (list sym) bad-args))) :bad-value)
"\n\n threw error\n\n"
(printer/pprint-str failure))
:else
"Success!\n"))))
(defn ^:private explain-data? [data]
(s/valid?
(s/keys :req
[::s/problems
::s/spec
::s/value]
:opt
[::s/failure])
data))
(defn ^:private check-result? [data]
(s/valid?
(s/keys :req-un [::spec]
:opt-un [::sym
::failure
:clojure.spec.test.check/ret])
data))
(defn ^:private printer-str [opts data]
(let [opts' (merge {:show-valid-values? false
:print-specs? true}
opts)
enable-color? (or (not= :none (get opts :theme :none))
ansi/*enable-color*)]
(binding [*value-str-fn* (get opts :value-str-fn (partial value-in-context opts'))
ansi/*enable-color* enable-color?
ansi/*print-styles* (case (get opts :theme (if enable-color? :figwheel-theme :none))
:figwheel-theme
figwheel-theme
:none
{})]
(cond
(or (explain-data? data)
(nil? data))
(print-explain-data opts' data)