You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The local unique identifier in the GlyGen prefix is actually a GlyTouCan ID, as we use these IDs to identify Glycans in GlyGen.
Contributor ORCID
0000-0001-8705-181X
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
katewarner
added
Merge
When considering merging two entries
Update
Used in combination with prefix, metaprefix, or collection for updates to entries
labels
Apr 8, 2024
Hi @katewarner, I think this makes sense. Interestingly, two other registries, Fairsharing, and Integbio also have separate entries for GlyGen and GlyToucan. In any case, what we could do is, keep the glytoucan prefix, but add glygen as a synonym prefix, and also list GlyGen as a "provider" for GlyToucan IDs.
From the little bit of information in this issue the complete solution comes down to the question of whether the org behind https://glygen.org/ (@jeet-vora) agrees with the assertion that the local id corresponds to a GlyTouCan ID. Right now, both glytoucan and glygen are registered as separate “semantic spaces” covering the same exact local ID space (as far as I can quickly see from the regex rules in both records):
Redundant Prefix
glygen
Target Prefix
glytoucan
Explanation
The local unique identifier in the GlyGen prefix is actually a GlyTouCan ID, as we use these IDs to identify Glycans in GlyGen.
Contributor ORCID
0000-0001-8705-181X
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: