You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Bisq has many places which strike a balance between privacy and user convenience.
However, some users might be ready to sacrifice one for the other, while not knowing exactly how to "configure" Bisq for that.
Therefore, Bisq could offer the users a choice about how they want to run Bisq / what defaults do they want Bisq to present them with.
A few examples:
Maximize Privacy mode
Maximize Convenience mode
Bitcoin nodes
Bisq would only connect to a local or a custom node
Bisq would behave as now, i.e. connect to the Bisq-provided nodes
Connection to Bitcoin nodes
only connect to Bitcoin nodes via Tor
connect to Bitcoin nodes in cleartext (faster startup and shutdown times)
Funding a trade
only offer the option to "Fund from External Wallet"
only offer the option to "Fund from Bisq Wallet"
Complete a trade
only offer the option to " Retrieve to External Wallet"
only offer the option to "Keep in Bisq Wallet"
These could be "defaults", which are set either way depending on the chosen mode -- but could be changed individually by the user under Settings as well.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Making the UX easier (as the default option) for the majority of people who are not interested in utmost privacy is very important. As it is now, most people cannot even use Bisq due to fear (of losing money) and not understanding how it works. They will still be far more private if they use a simplified Bisq, than if they use a centralised exchange.
I also advocate a one-click offer possibility with prefilled fields (if the offer is not the first one) to reduce friction.
Bisq has many places which strike a balance between privacy and user convenience.
However, some users might be ready to sacrifice one for the other, while not knowing exactly how to "configure" Bisq for that.
Therefore, Bisq could offer the users a choice about how they want to run Bisq / what defaults do they want Bisq to present them with.
A few examples:
These could be "defaults", which are set either way depending on the chosen mode -- but could be changed individually by the user under Settings as well.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: