New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Lock total fiat amount on buy bitcoin offer #515
Comments
Hi, Look at the video uploaded. 1- If I can't lock the fiat amount to spend, I think the field should not be "active" My opinion: The field (amount in fiat to spend) should not be active. I think should, instead, have an field like: Never spend more than ..... in fiat money, |
Upps thats a bug. I think once u change the fiat price it will work, but will have a look.... |
Yes, when i change fiat price, it will work. |
Yes good point. Will consider that once I work on improvements for the UI. |
Philosophically, when you lock the fiat amount that becomes the base currency. Since our base currency is - and should be - bitcoin, I can't see this as being a useful feature, especially since it would fail if the price feed data suddenly wasn't available. We're not a fiat exchange, we're a bitcoin exchange. |
It would be useful to at least have a limit on the fiat/altcoin amount in cases where you have some kind of transfer limit or don't want to risk ending up in a short position. |
Stiell, I agree that a limit order would be useful. I was trying to buy 1 BTC at AU$1200 about a month ago and had no sellers to buy from. If I hadn't cancelled the order I would now be paying over AU$2000 |
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions. |
This issue has been automatically closed because of inactivity. Feel free to reopen it if you think it is still relevant. |
I think should have an option to lock total fiat amount on buy bitcoin offer.
Ex: the total of bitcoins I'll buy could fluctuate, but the fiat amount I'll spend, needs to be the same.
Understand?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: