Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

The 1.6.0 mediation style is confusing #5367

Closed
Akira45-0 opened this issue Mar 28, 2021 · 4 comments · Fixed by #5370
Closed

The 1.6.0 mediation style is confusing #5367

Akira45-0 opened this issue Mar 28, 2021 · 4 comments · Fixed by #5370

Comments

@Akira45-0
Copy link

Hello. I would like to point out that the new mediation style introduced in 1.6.0 is very confusing. Now the chat with the mediator is opened in a separate window, just like chat with the peer. They look the same, so it is very easy to send message to the peer instead of the mediator and the other way around, without even noticing it which may result in unnecessary delays. The previous style, where chat with the mediator had no separate window was immune to this confusion. Thank you.

@boring-cyborg
Copy link

boring-cyborg bot commented Mar 28, 2021

Thanks for opening your first issue here!

Be sure to follow the issue template. Your issue will be reviewed by a maintainer and labeled for further action.

@wallclockbuilder
Copy link
Contributor

Its not working as intended. Perhaps you should file a bug report. Use the format.

Description

-- brief description of the bug --

Version

Steps to reproduce

Expected behaviour

Actual behaviour

`### Screenshots

Additional info

`

@ripcurlx
Copy link
Member

@jmacxx Maybe we could add a visual border indication that it is clear if it is a dispute window or a trader chat window.

@Conza88
Copy link

Conza88 commented Apr 6, 2021

Good solution

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

4 participants