Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ACKs on the site? #19

Closed
narula opened this issue Jan 13, 2016 · 4 comments
Closed

ACKs on the site? #19

narula opened this issue Jan 13, 2016 · 4 comments

Comments

@narula
Copy link

narula commented Jan 13, 2016

Happy to see this website!

Could you consider adding a list of people who ACK the website and a system for people to add/remove themselves to this list? Like what was done for this post:

bitcoin-dot-org/Bitcoin.org#1165

Or perhaps even do so for each page/post on the site.

@btcdrak
Copy link
Contributor

btcdrak commented Jan 13, 2016

@narula thanks for the suggestion. We certainly do need a catchment area for roadmap signatures and it would make sense for some other things too where we need to update website content, for example if we add a page showing which wallets have segwit adoption on their roadmaps.

You are welcome to get involved in the review process on any pull request.

@laanwj
Copy link
Member

laanwj commented Jan 14, 2016

I don't know. It is usually changes (github pull requests) that are ACKed, not so much pages itself. In most cases it's an informal way to assess if other people agree with a change or not.

The page that you reference is different - as it is a statement that may be controversial to some people, the list of names is a list of signatures of people that agree with it.

The rest of the site is not meant to be a list of controversial statements but e.g. documentation and blogs about larger projects that people are working on. So I'm not sure that a list of ACKs on the site is helpful. It's always possible to look at git history, at the pull requests on github, to see who is the author and who commented on the change.

@btcdrak
Copy link
Contributor

btcdrak commented Jan 14, 2016

@laanwj There are a couple of cases I can think where it would be useful administratively. I intend putting up a "who will add segwit support to their wallet/service" page to show which wallets are on board. After the page is merged, more wallet vendors could add their ACK to let us know of their support and we can add it. It could help administratively compared to what I am doing at the moment which is reaching out manually and recording support manually in a spreadsheet. We can use this sparingly when it is appropriate, which I agree is not likely to be that often..

@btcdrak
Copy link
Contributor

btcdrak commented Jan 18, 2016

@narula Thanks for the suggestions, I'll close this ticket now.

@btcdrak btcdrak closed this as completed Jan 18, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants