You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In RetinaFace paper, it has 4 losses and has different weights for each, roughly has a ratio of 65:25:10:1.
Understood that you did not put the dense regression loss in implementation. and I saw a 2:1:1 in the config, just wonder is this the findout of your cross validation to balance the three losses?
Did you test other ratios?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Parameters in the paper can get good results in the author's experiment based on mxnet. Some differences in implementation details lead to some differences in parameters. We often give more weight to the information we pay more attention to.
In RetinaFace paper, it has 4 losses and has different weights for each, roughly has a ratio of 65:25:10:1.
Understood that you did not put the dense regression loss in implementation. and I saw a 2:1:1 in the config, just wonder is this the findout of your cross validation to balance the three losses?
Did you test other ratios?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: