Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Aug 1, 2023. It is now read-only.

Product Hunt to add feedback to reviews #3

Closed
GinaAbrams opened this issue Jan 28, 2019 · 4 comments
Closed

Product Hunt to add feedback to reviews #3

GinaAbrams opened this issue Jan 28, 2019 · 4 comments
Assignees

Comments

@GinaAbrams
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@GinaAbrams GinaAbrams self-assigned this Jan 28, 2019
@stackatron
Copy link

Need more clarity from PH.

@stackatron stackatron added this to the Sprint 2: Week 5-6 milestone Feb 4, 2019
@hstove
Copy link
Collaborator

hstove commented Feb 11, 2019

@GinaAbrams to follow up again.

@fiatexodus
Copy link

This is still a significant problem in the February App Mining--specifically the Product Hunt Team score which is simply a number. I've outlined the problem further in my forum post (https://forum.blockstack.org/t/blockstack-february-app-mining-progress-review/7552/1):

Issue #3: ... [ @pstan26 ] ... mentioned in the January App Mining review that Blockstack has been talking with Product Hunt to get more information than just a number for the Product Hunt (PH) Team Score. The February data contained only a number. The Stealthy PH Team Score dropped from 8.85 in December to 6.25 in January and has remained there. Why? This is confusing. Stealthy underwent considerable UI and performance changes from January to February, which are reflected by Try My UI scoring (-.904 to .493). If the PH Team Score is about the product, why didn’t it reflect this? We believe the PH Team Score should be removed from App Mining until PH provides a detailed explanation about what influences it (note that we have no objection to continuing to use the Product Hunt Community Score in App Mining–though it’s game-ability is a separate issue to consider).

@GinaAbrams
Copy link
Contributor Author

No longer relevant, closing. More info here

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants