Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Duplicates: Add to CSV Export #1352

Closed
kathyccheng opened this issue Jun 9, 2021 · 3 comments
Closed

Duplicates: Add to CSV Export #1352

kathyccheng opened this issue Jun 9, 2021 · 3 comments
Assignees
Labels
partners Relates to the Partners site

Comments

@kathyccheng
Copy link
Collaborator

kathyccheng commented Jun 9, 2021

In order to round out the first pass of duplicates, we want to add two columns to the Applications CSV Export

Flagged

  • This column will include all applications marked as a potential duplicate based on any of the rules
  • The values should be yes, no
  • It does NOT need to include any mention of the particular rule set

Duplicates

  • This column should mark applications that the leasing agent has gone in and marked as duplicate in the flagged applications table

Notes

  • We can put these columns at the end, so the last 2 columns after household members. If that's tricky for any reason because household member column varies depending on the number of household members, then let's put it at the beginning after Application Submission Date and Before First Name
  • Some potential behavior. If an application was flagged as a potential duplicate and then confirmed by the leasing agent as a duplicate, then I would expect a yes in both columns above. If the application was flagged as a potential duplicate, but not marked as duplicate, then I would expect a yes in the flagged column and then a no in the duplicates column. If the leasing agent never used any of the UI in the flagged application table, then I would expect yes's in the flagged column based on our rules and then nothing in the duplicates column.
@kathyccheng
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@pbn4 this is what I was thinking for rounding out the first round of duplicates work. based on how we're storing stuff now, does that path above make sense to you?

@kathyccheng
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@software-project I think this is now Ready for QA now that the PR's been merged in right? Can you add the label?

Also, could you seed a listing on dev that is accepting applications so I can test this? Right now listings mgmt doesn't have the using digital application question hooked up yet so I can't create any listings with the Apply button to create applications to test this with.

@software-project software-project added the ready for qa Ready to be QA’d label Jul 22, 2021
@kathyccheng kathyccheng removed the ready for qa Ready to be QA’d label Jul 30, 2021
@kathyccheng
Copy link
Collaborator Author

This looks good!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
partners Relates to the Partners site
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants