Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

727: Add a Generic application option for using an arbitrary simulation model #35

Open
bluemodel-bot opened this issue Dec 12, 2021 · 0 comments · May be fixed by #239
Open

727: Add a Generic application option for using an arbitrary simulation model #35

bluemodel-bot opened this issue Dec 12, 2021 · 0 comments · May be fixed by #239
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@bluemodel-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

Original bug ID 727
Reported by froehlich on 2020-02-14
Affects version 1.7
Component Allgemein
Severity enhancement
Priority P1
Milestone 1.8
Assigned to froehlich
Status ASSIGNED

Comments:

froehlich on 2020-02-14:

A Generic application option could allow the user to be able to use almost any simulation model he wants.

Basic idea and points to consider:

  • the user specifies a batch file (*.bat) as part of the dataset. This batch file is executed by BlueM.Opt to start the simulation.
  • For the objective functions, we must make it possible to specify an arbitrary file (with filename and relative path) and a position within that file (row, columns) for reading the objective function value.
  • if we want to allow multithreading, BlueM.Opt has to copy the entire dataset folder to the thread folders. This folder must contain all files necessary for simulation (possibly also the model exe). This also requires that the model relies only on relative paths.
    Shouldnt be too hard to implement.

froehlich on 2020-02-14:

I have started implementing this in /branches/bug727

@bluemodel-bot bluemodel-bot added the enhancement New feature or request label Dec 12, 2021
@jamaa jamaa self-assigned this Dec 12, 2021
@jamaa jamaa linked a pull request Dec 16, 2023 that will close this issue
@jamaa jamaa linked a pull request Dec 16, 2023 that will close this issue
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants