Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
105 lines (96 loc) · 10.9 KB

File metadata and controls

105 lines (96 loc) · 10.9 KB

layout: person nodeid: bookofproofs$Schouten categories: history,19th-century parentid: bookofproofs$603 tags: astronomy,origin-netherlands orderid: 1883 title: Schouten, Jan Arnoldus born: 1883 died: 1971 keywords: jan a schouten,schouten description: Jan A Schouten worked on tensor analysis and its applications. references: bookofproofs$6909 contributors: @J-J-O'Connor,@E-F-Robertson,bookofproofs



Schouten.jpg

Jan A Schouten worked on tensor analysis and its applications.

Mathematical Profile (Excerpt):

  • We note at this point that Jan Schouten died in Nijmegen on 10 July 1900 at age 54 while Hulda Schouten lived to age 86 dying in Nijmegen on 20 August 1933.
  • Jan Arnoldus attended elementary school, then high school, in Nijmegen.
  • He learnt Dutch and German, becoming fluent in both languages, but his native language was German.
  • He excelled at mathematics at high school and, not having qualifications to enter university, as a consequence entered the Military Academy in Breda.
  • At this time students required a pass in a classical language in their final examination to enter university and Schouten had not studied any classical language.
  • He studied electrical engineering at the Technische Hogeschool and then for several years he was an electrical engineer.
  • After a year of practical experience at Siemens in Berlin he graduated in 1908.
  • Here he met Maria Margaretha Backer, who had been a fellow student with Schouten at the high school, but by this time was a law student in Leiden.
  • Maria had been born in Nijmegen on 1 May 1887; her parents were Jean Paul Frederic Backer, a cigar manufacturer, and Dorothea Cornelia Fik.
  • Soon after the award of his electrical engineering degree from Delft, Schouten became an inspector at the Department of Local Electricity Works in Rotterdam.
  • He made many trips abroad and was a contributor to the electrification of Rotterdam.
  • He was encouraged by Johan Antony Barrau (1874-1953) who had been a student of Diederik Johannes Korteweg and received a doctorate from the University of Amsterdam in 1907.
  • At first Barrau advised Schouten but, after he left Delft for Groningen in 1913 to become Schoute's successor as professor of geometry, Jacob Cardinaal became Schouten's advisor.
  • Jacob Cardinaal (1848-1922) had been a student of Jan de Vries and, in September 1893, had been appointed professor at the Polytechnic University in Delft.
  • Cardinaal wrote the first Dutch book on kinematics in 1914.
  • Schouten's doctoral thesis Grundlagen der Vektor- und Affinoranalysis Ⓣ(Basics of vector and affine analysis), presented in 1914, was on tensor analysis, a topic he worked on all his life.
  • That same year he became professor of mathematics at the Polytechnic University in Delft and held the post for nearly 30 years.
  • He was rector of the University for the year 1938-39.
  • Dirk Struik became Schouten's assistant in 1917.
  • Through Ehrenfest, he was told that this fellow Struik might be the right person.
  • Schouten was, as were so many mathematicians at that time, deeply interested in the theory of relativity.
  • Schouten was working on his form of what we now call tensor analysis.
  • He called it afinial analysis.
  • By and by, he introduced me to it.
  • And we published a good deal.
  • He became not only one of the founders of the "Ricci calculus" but also an efficient organiser (he was a founder of the Mathematical Centre at Amsterdam in 1946) and an astute investor.
  • A meticulous lecturer and painfully accurate author, he instilled the same standards in his pupils.
  • Of course, working on tensor analysis put Schouten in the exciting area of developments associated with the theory of relativity.
  • He produced 180 papers and 6 books on tensor analysis, applying tensor analysis to Lie groups, general relativity, unified field theory, and differential equations.
  • Influenced by Weyl and Eddington, Schouten investigated affine, projective and conformal mappings.
  • Klein's Erlanger Programm of 1872 looked at geometry as properties invariant under the action of a group.
  • This approach had a large influence on Schouten's approach to his topic.
  • In 1915 he discovered the Levi-Civita connection in Riemannian manifolds independently of Levi-Civita but since his paper only appeared in 1919, a year later than Levi-Civita's, he received no credit.
  • L E J Brouwer did not support Schouten and relations between the two were poor for a number of years until Weitzenböck got them to patch up their differences in 1929.
  • Up to the point when he saw Gregorio Ricci-Curbastro's and Tulio Levi-Civita's work, Schouten's notation had been, by his own admission, difficult to understand but, once he saw their notation he accepted it immediately as simpler than his own.
  • He published a monograph On the Determination of the Principle Laws of Statistical Astronomy in 1918 and his classic work on the Ricci calculus Der Ricci-Kalkül : Eine Einführung in die neueren Methoden und Probleme der mehrdimensionalen Differentialgeometrie Ⓣ(The Ricci calculus: an Introduction to the newer methods and problems of multi-dimensional differential geometry) in 1924.
  • It is interesting to note that despite publishing a greatly expanded and updated version in 1954 (which we discuss below) a corrected reprinting of the original 1924 edition was published in 1978.
  • Schouten certainly did not work in isolation but collaborated and corresponded with other leading workers in the area.
  • He interacted with Élie Cartan, Ludwig Berwald, Oswald Veblen, Alexander Friedmann, Arthur Eddington and Wolfgang Pauli writing joint papers with some of them.
  • For example in 1924 he published Über die Geometrie der halb-symmetrischen Übertragungen Ⓣ(On the geometry of the semi-symmetrical transmissions) jointly with Alexander Friedmann, and in 1926 he published two papers written jointly with Élie Cartan: On Riemaniann geometries admitting an absolute parallelism, and On the Geometry of the Group-manifold of Simple and Semi-simple Groups.
  • On a trip to the United States in 1931 he discussed his current work on spinors with Veblen.
  • He attended the international conference on differential geometry organised by Benjamin Fedorovich Kagan which took place at Moscow University in 1934.
  • In the following year the first of the two volumes of a monograph written in collaboration with Dirk Struik, Einführung in die Neuen Methoden der Differentialgeometrie Ⓣ(Introduction to new methods of differential geometry), appeared.
  • The second volume was published three years later in 1938.
  • Although both authors appear on both volumes (each dedicated to Tullio Levi-Civita), the first volume is largely the work of Schouten while the second is largely the work of Struik.
  • Schouten, in collaboration with W van der Kulk, published Pfaff's Problem and Its Generalizations in 1949.
  • The theme is presented in tensor language, by which a great unity of form and content is achieved.
  • It embraces both the older theories of Jacobi and Mayer and the newer theories of Cartan, Kähler and the authors.
  • Though the text does not assume a prior acquaintanceship with tensor theory, it is desirable that the reader possess some background in the subject.
  • For such a reader as well as for the specialist, this text will furnish a wealth of useful and unified information.
  • Rather it is meant to imply the author's attempt (largely successful) to give the fruits of his long experience of lecturing in the form of physical pictures of the concepts used at each stage.
  • We mentioned above Schouten's Ricci-calculus.
  • An introduction to tensor analysis and its geometrical applications (1954).
  • The author has played an active part in the development of the subject and results originally published in papers have also appeared in books written by the author in collaboration with others.
  • The greater part of the work now appears however in its proper setting, and for the first time we have a comprehensive account of the work to date in certain well-defined fields.
  • Let us return to look at the later part of Schouten's career.
  • From then on, he lived in semiseclusion at Epe.
  • From 1948 until 1953 Schouten was professor of mathematics at the University of Amsterdam but he did not teach.
  • He was a co-founder of the Mathematical Research Centre at Amsterdam in 1946 and was its director from 1950 to 1955.
  • Schouten was president of the 1954 International Congress of Mathematicians at Amsterdam.
  • We end this biography by examining Schouten's role in the journal Compositio Mathematica because it sheds considerable light on his personality.
  • The journal had been run by L E J Brouwer and published by the House of Noordhoff, Groningen, but had to cease production in 1940 because of World War II.
  • Schouten's reputation as a geometer was beyond question, and he was considered one of the leading Dutch mathematicians.
  • He had in 1943 resigned from his Delft chair, and withdrawn himself to a quiet part of the country, but his influence was still considerable and Noordhoff must have seen in him a valuable ally in the attempt to edge out Brouwer.
  • Although Brouwer and Schouten had had their differences in the early 1920s (patched up in 1929 after the mediation of Weitzenböck), animosity was certainly not the motivation of Schouten to take Noordhoff's side.
  • Schouten was one of the editors of 'Compositio' of the first hour; it was probably a sincere wish to restore 'Compositio' to its old glory, that made him an actor in the 'Compositio' affair.
  • Schouten wanted to keep Brouwer involved with Compositio Mathematica but only as one of several editors rather than having overall control.
  • His letters, obviously well-meant, were of the half-patronizing, half-schoolmastering kind that goes against the grain.
  • Having failed to persuade Brouwer to follow the route he favoured, Schouten tried to convince other members of the Committee of Administration, most of whom sided with Brouwer, that he was right.
  • Some of Schouten's arguments and claims had a degree of plausibility, but if they contained some truth, certainly not the whole truth.
  • In particular his protestation that he did not attempt to remove Brouwer seems a bit lame ...
  • It is clear that Schouten's motives were honourable and he wanted to do the best for Brouwer and the journal.
  • However, like many others he found Brouwer difficult to deal with.
  • Taking the initiative he went ahead with proposals to restart the journal without Brouwer's knowledge in late 1949.
  • His proposals gave Brouwer a position as "honorary president" but, when Brouwer found out what was going on, threats of court action from Brouwer followed.
  • There are many more twists to the story involving many mathematicians.

Born 28 August 1883, Nieuwer Amstel (now part of Amsterdam), Netherlands. Died 20 January 1971, Epe, The Netherlands.

View full biography at MacTutor