You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Does the current behavior makes sense? I don't think so.
I do see why it is interesting to know how many iterations were fitted for mu and sigma but at the same time, we cannot reuse this information. We only care about the total number of steps.
So it would preferable to primarily show the single mstop value.
Furthermore, we need to check all documentation where we state that mstop can be assigned as a named vector etc. That must be consistent and correct.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
in most cases it is more interesting to see the distribution of the iterations that the overall iterations (which is specified by the user).
this would break a lot of my code since I use the mstop() function a lot in the internal fitting process.
What we could do is if mstop(model) <- c(mu = 10, sigma = 20) is called we use sum(c(mu = 10, sigma = 20)) as new mstop and give a warning to the user?
Does the current behavior makes sense? I don't think so.
I do see why it is interesting to know how many iterations were fitted for mu and sigma but at the same time, we cannot reuse this information. We only care about the total number of steps.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: