Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Byte range support in S3 Transfer Manager #1215

Open
stefanmoro opened this issue Aug 9, 2017 · 1 comment
Open

Byte range support in S3 Transfer Manager #1215

stefanmoro opened this issue Aug 9, 2017 · 1 comment
Labels
automation-exempt feature-request This issue requests a feature. needs-review p3 This is a minor priority issue

Comments

@stefanmoro
Copy link

Hi All!

I've been using the S3 Transfer Manager (http://boto3.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reference/customizations/s3.html) for quite some time and I'm really happy with the increased performance it gives when downloading/uploading large objects. The built in retry mechanism is also very helpful.

I just started a new project where I'll work with really large objects that I want to process in parts. The idea is to use byte ranges to fetch parts of an object using byte ranges, process it and then fetch the next part. These parts can be as large as several 100MB so multipart download would speed things up. I'm aware that byte range requests can be used with http://boto3.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reference/services/s3.html#S3.Client.get_object, but then I'd have to implement multipart and retry mechanisms myself (if I've understood things correctly).

Is there a way to use byte ranges with the S3 Transfer Manager that I haven't figured out yet? If not, are there any plans to support it in the future?

Thanks
Stefan

@dstufft
Copy link
Contributor

dstufft commented Aug 11, 2017

There is not currently a way to do this, I'll go ahead and mark this as a feature request.

@dstufft dstufft added the feature-request This issue requests a feature. label Aug 11, 2017
@swetashre swetashre added the auto-label-exempt Issue will not be subject to stale-bot label May 19, 2020
@github-actions github-actions bot added the closing-soon This issue will automatically close in 4 days unless further comments are made. label Sep 23, 2021
@kdaily kdaily added automation-exempt and removed closing-soon This issue will automatically close in 4 days unless further comments are made. auto-label-exempt Issue will not be subject to stale-bot labels Sep 23, 2021
@boto boto deleted a comment from github-actions bot Sep 23, 2021
@aBurmeseDev aBurmeseDev added the p3 This is a minor priority issue label Nov 3, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
automation-exempt feature-request This issue requests a feature. needs-review p3 This is a minor priority issue
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants