Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

In AppFlow, include more options on describe_flow_execution_records #3797

Closed
2 tasks
mfnagato opened this issue Jul 26, 2023 · 3 comments
Closed
2 tasks

In AppFlow, include more options on describe_flow_execution_records #3797

mfnagato opened this issue Jul 26, 2023 · 3 comments
Assignees
Labels
feature-request This issue requests a feature. service-api This issue is caused by the service API, not the SDK implementation.

Comments

@mfnagato
Copy link

Describe the feature

The function describe_flow_execution_records currently returns all execution records of a flow.
Since starting flows from boto3 code is asynchronous, I'd like to start a flow but follow it up more efficiently using this function.
The suggested features would be to allow filtering by:

  • executionId
  • startedAt between 2 given timestamps (both optional)
  • execution status

Use Case

I'd like to start a flow from boto3 code, like already available, but then follow it up more efficiently with the options described in the previous field for function describe_flow_execution_records .

Proposed Solution

As described in 1st field.

Other Information

No response

Acknowledgements

  • I may be able to implement this feature request
  • This feature might incur a breaking change

SDK version used

1.28.4

Environment details (OS name and version, etc.)

python 3

@mfnagato mfnagato added feature-request This issue requests a feature. needs-triage This issue or PR still needs to be triaged. labels Jul 26, 2023
@tim-finnigan tim-finnigan self-assigned this Jul 28, 2023
@tim-finnigan
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @mfnagato thanks for reaching out. I looked at another issue involving these commands a while ago, there may be some overlap in your use cases: aws/aws-cli#6632

The AppFlow team owns the StartFlow and DescribeFlowExecutionRecords APIs which Boto3 and other AWS SDKs use. So we can forward feature requests like this to that team. If you have a support plan we recommend reaching out through AWS Support with requests like this. Otherwise we can reach out to the AppFlow team on your behalf. Please let us know.

@tim-finnigan tim-finnigan added response-requested Waiting on additional information or feedback. service-api This issue is caused by the service API, not the SDK implementation. and removed needs-triage This issue or PR still needs to be triaged. labels Jul 28, 2023
@mfnagato
Copy link
Author

Hi @tim-finnigan ,
I looked at the issue you mentioned, but I didn't find a request for improvement in describe_flow_execution_records. Can you forward the feature request to the appropriate team?

Thanks!

@tim-finnigan
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks @mfnagato for following up. I've reached out to the AppFlow team for further feedback on this and created aws/aws-sdk#568 for tracking going forward. Please refer to that issue for future updates.

@tim-finnigan tim-finnigan removed the response-requested Waiting on additional information or feedback. label Jul 31, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
feature-request This issue requests a feature. service-api This issue is caused by the service API, not the SDK implementation.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants