New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Slab leak in Android Kernel #57
Comments
Hi Adrien, Thanks for this report. We've seen issues with Android 8 indeed. We'll look into it as soon as possible but we have many ongoing projects at this time. Regards, |
+1 Are there any updates? |
+1 |
Sorry we haven't had a chance to look at it yet. |
I looked into the code and it looks like the fences created in viv_fence_create (os/linux/kernel/gc_hal_kernel_sync.c) are never released. Maybe I am wrong or this is not relevant. But if this is the problem, is there a way to release the fence? |
Quick update, now looking into this issue. |
Another update:
However after updating some part of the driver to p9, that fence leak is gone but the main leak isn't.
|
@gibsson Thank you such much for your effort. I really appreciate it. I will give your patch a try. I will talk to my colleagues checking if we can migrate to android 9. Do you keep working on the issue? Once again: Thank you such much! |
The behaviour is much better with this patch |
Hi Romain, Yes, there were 2 leaks before, that patch only fixes 1 of them (the one in the kernel). Regards, |
Hi Gary, Thank you for your quick reply! Best regards, |
Hi Romain, I've tried, with no luck. They recommended changing release as well. Regards, |
Hi Gary, No problem, my customer asked me to ask this question. Thanks, |
Hi Gary, Here is the link to the NXP community forum where the request has been posted yesterday: Best regards, |
Hi Romain, |
Hi Gary, Best regards, |
Hello @JeansHH @ep-skolberg, Can you add a comment about your issue on the NXP forum? Thanks, |
done |
Hello, NXP did a test on Pixel mobile and reproduced the issue using our app. So it's not clear if it's really a imx6 issue or not. |
Has anyone other than NXP been able to verify that claim? |
Not yet, I was looking at testing Android 8 on a potato board or a Rasperry-pi. https://libre.computer/2018/09/27/android-release-for-tritium-and-le-potato If the issue is really not related to NXP firmware but Android AOSP part, the issue should be reproducible with an emulator ? Thanks again Gary! |
Hi Gary, I tried to reproduce the leak using two different board: a RasperryPi 3 with LineageOS image (15.1 based on Android 8.0 but with a kernel 4.4), a Le Potato from the link above (Android 8.0.0, kernel 4.9.61). I'm unable to reproduce the issue so far, even on Le Potato board using an Android image very close to the image provided by BoundaryDevice for the Sabrelite board. I'm not sure how NXP is able to reproduce the issue on a Android Pixel phone... Best regards, |
Hi, |
Hi, I reproduced this issue on my Pixel 2 (to a lesser extent) on android-8.0.0_r34 (the last aosp release for Pixel 2) running on kernel 4.4.56-g594d847d09a1. 18h12 20h24 Thanks, |
I am closing this issue as the kernel doesn't have any leak any longer. |
…le_activate [ Upstream commit 5808fec ] In case if isi.nr_pages is 0, we are making sis->pages (which is unsigned int) a huge value in iomap_swapfile_activate() by assigning -1. This could cause a kernel crash in kernel v4.18 (with below signature). Or could lead to unknown issues on latest kernel if the fake big swap gets used. Fix this issue by returning -EINVAL in case of nr_pages is 0, since it is anyway a invalid swapfile. Looks like this issue will be hit when we have pagesize < blocksize type of configuration. I was able to hit the issue in case of a tiny swap file with below test script. https://raw.githubusercontent.com/riteshharjani/LinuxStudy/master/scripts/swap-issue.sh kernel crash analysis on v4.18 ============================== On v4.18 kernel, it causes a kernel panic, since sis->pages becomes a huge value and isi.nr_extents is 0. When 0 is returned it is considered as a swapfile over NFS and SWP_FILE is set (sis->flags |= SWP_FILE). Then when swapoff was getting called it was calling a_ops->swap_deactivate() if (sis->flags & SWP_FILE) is true. Since a_ops->swap_deactivate() is NULL in case of XFS, it causes below panic. Panic signature on v4.18 kernel: ======================================= root@qemu:/home/qemu# [ 8291.723351] XFS (loop2): Unmounting Filesystem [ 8292.123104] XFS (loop2): Mounting V5 Filesystem [ 8292.132451] XFS (loop2): Ending clean mount [ 8292.263362] Adding 4294967232k swap on /mnt1/test/swapfile. Priority:-2 extents:1 across:274877906880k [ 8292.277834] Unable to handle kernel paging request for instruction fetch [ 8292.278677] Faulting instruction address: 0x00000000 cpu 0x19: Vector: 400 (Instruction Access) at [c0000009dd5b7ad0] pc: 0000000000000000 lr: c0000000003eb9dc: destroy_swap_extents+0xfc/0x120 sp: c0000009dd5b7d50 msr: 8000000040009033 current = 0xc0000009b6710080 paca = 0xc00000003ffcb280 irqmask: 0x03 irq_happened: 0x01 pid = 5604, comm = swapoff Linux version 4.18.0 (riteshh@xxxxxxx) (gcc version 8.4.0 (Ubuntu 8.4.0-1ubuntu1~18.04)) #57 SMP Wed Mar 3 01:33:04 CST 2021 enter ? for help [link register ] c0000000003eb9dc destroy_swap_extents+0xfc/0x120 [c0000009dd5b7d50] c0000000025a7058 proc_poll_event+0x0/0x4 (unreliable) [c0000009dd5b7da0] c0000000003f0498 sys_swapoff+0x3f8/0x910 [c0000009dd5b7e30] c00000000000bbe4 system_call+0x5c/0x70 Exception: c01 (System Call) at 00007ffff7d208d8 Signed-off-by: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@linux.ibm.com> [djwong: rework the comment to provide more details] Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
…le_activate [ Upstream commit 5808fec ] In case if isi.nr_pages is 0, we are making sis->pages (which is unsigned int) a huge value in iomap_swapfile_activate() by assigning -1. This could cause a kernel crash in kernel v4.18 (with below signature). Or could lead to unknown issues on latest kernel if the fake big swap gets used. Fix this issue by returning -EINVAL in case of nr_pages is 0, since it is anyway a invalid swapfile. Looks like this issue will be hit when we have pagesize < blocksize type of configuration. I was able to hit the issue in case of a tiny swap file with below test script. https://raw.githubusercontent.com/riteshharjani/LinuxStudy/master/scripts/swap-issue.sh kernel crash analysis on v4.18 ============================== On v4.18 kernel, it causes a kernel panic, since sis->pages becomes a huge value and isi.nr_extents is 0. When 0 is returned it is considered as a swapfile over NFS and SWP_FILE is set (sis->flags |= SWP_FILE). Then when swapoff was getting called it was calling a_ops->swap_deactivate() if (sis->flags & SWP_FILE) is true. Since a_ops->swap_deactivate() is NULL in case of XFS, it causes below panic. Panic signature on v4.18 kernel: ======================================= root@qemu:/home/qemu# [ 8291.723351] XFS (loop2): Unmounting Filesystem [ 8292.123104] XFS (loop2): Mounting V5 Filesystem [ 8292.132451] XFS (loop2): Ending clean mount [ 8292.263362] Adding 4294967232k swap on /mnt1/test/swapfile. Priority:-2 extents:1 across:274877906880k [ 8292.277834] Unable to handle kernel paging request for instruction fetch [ 8292.278677] Faulting instruction address: 0x00000000 cpu 0x19: Vector: 400 (Instruction Access) at [c0000009dd5b7ad0] pc: 0000000000000000 lr: c0000000003eb9dc: destroy_swap_extents+0xfc/0x120 sp: c0000009dd5b7d50 msr: 8000000040009033 current = 0xc0000009b6710080 paca = 0xc00000003ffcb280 irqmask: 0x03 irq_happened: 0x01 pid = 5604, comm = swapoff Linux version 4.18.0 (riteshh@xxxxxxx) (gcc version 8.4.0 (Ubuntu 8.4.0-1ubuntu1~18.04)) #57 SMP Wed Mar 3 01:33:04 CST 2021 enter ? for help [link register ] c0000000003eb9dc destroy_swap_extents+0xfc/0x120 [c0000009dd5b7d50] c0000000025a7058 proc_poll_event+0x0/0x4 (unreliable) [c0000009dd5b7da0] c0000000003f0498 sys_swapoff+0x3f8/0x910 [c0000009dd5b7e30] c00000000000bbe4 system_call+0x5c/0x70 Exception: c01 (System Call) at 00007ffff7d208d8 Signed-off-by: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@linux.ibm.com> [djwong: rework the comment to provide more details] Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
…le_activate [ Upstream commit 5808fec ] In case if isi.nr_pages is 0, we are making sis->pages (which is unsigned int) a huge value in iomap_swapfile_activate() by assigning -1. This could cause a kernel crash in kernel v4.18 (with below signature). Or could lead to unknown issues on latest kernel if the fake big swap gets used. Fix this issue by returning -EINVAL in case of nr_pages is 0, since it is anyway a invalid swapfile. Looks like this issue will be hit when we have pagesize < blocksize type of configuration. I was able to hit the issue in case of a tiny swap file with below test script. https://raw.githubusercontent.com/riteshharjani/LinuxStudy/master/scripts/swap-issue.sh kernel crash analysis on v4.18 ============================== On v4.18 kernel, it causes a kernel panic, since sis->pages becomes a huge value and isi.nr_extents is 0. When 0 is returned it is considered as a swapfile over NFS and SWP_FILE is set (sis->flags |= SWP_FILE). Then when swapoff was getting called it was calling a_ops->swap_deactivate() if (sis->flags & SWP_FILE) is true. Since a_ops->swap_deactivate() is NULL in case of XFS, it causes below panic. Panic signature on v4.18 kernel: ======================================= root@qemu:/home/qemu# [ 8291.723351] XFS (loop2): Unmounting Filesystem [ 8292.123104] XFS (loop2): Mounting V5 Filesystem [ 8292.132451] XFS (loop2): Ending clean mount [ 8292.263362] Adding 4294967232k swap on /mnt1/test/swapfile. Priority:-2 extents:1 across:274877906880k [ 8292.277834] Unable to handle kernel paging request for instruction fetch [ 8292.278677] Faulting instruction address: 0x00000000 cpu 0x19: Vector: 400 (Instruction Access) at [c0000009dd5b7ad0] pc: 0000000000000000 lr: c0000000003eb9dc: destroy_swap_extents+0xfc/0x120 sp: c0000009dd5b7d50 msr: 8000000040009033 current = 0xc0000009b6710080 paca = 0xc00000003ffcb280 irqmask: 0x03 irq_happened: 0x01 pid = 5604, comm = swapoff Linux version 4.18.0 (riteshh@xxxxxxx) (gcc version 8.4.0 (Ubuntu 8.4.0-1ubuntu1~18.04)) #57 SMP Wed Mar 3 01:33:04 CST 2021 enter ? for help [link register ] c0000000003eb9dc destroy_swap_extents+0xfc/0x120 [c0000009dd5b7d50] c0000000025a7058 proc_poll_event+0x0/0x4 (unreliable) [c0000009dd5b7da0] c0000000003f0498 sys_swapoff+0x3f8/0x910 [c0000009dd5b7e30] c00000000000bbe4 system_call+0x5c/0x70 Exception: c01 (System Call) at 00007ffff7d208d8 Signed-off-by: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@linux.ibm.com> [djwong: rework the comment to provide more details] Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Hi,
When trying Android 8 on a Sabrelite, I encounter an issue (located in the kernel (4.9.88 - commit 2324d06)).
The "Slab memory" is leaking when the graphics system (SurfaceFlinger) does composition.
For example, I wrote an application that pop a Toast as fast as possible.
Before running the test, cat /proc/meminfo gives:
Slab: 42092 kB
SReclaimable: 15076 kB
SUnreclaim: 27016 kB
After Running the application for 10-15 minutes:
Slab: 78960 kB
SReclaimable: 14828 kB
SUnreclaim: 64132 kB
After killing the application:
Slab: 80956 kB
SReclaimable: 14960 kB
SUnreclaim: 65996 kB
The "SUnreclaim" is not freed.
Could you please help me to fix this issue.
Thanks,
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: