You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Some footprints I use result in the parts being placed rotated and with a offset in the JLCPCB placement preview.
For rotation, there is a setting in the plugin but for position offsets, there isn’t (as far as I can tell).
Describe the solution you'd like
I’d like to have the option to store a offset that should be used when adding a part to the POS file. Just like the rotation.
Specifying an offset as a relative value (move by dx/dy) would be fine.
Of course there could be other options that simplify the entry:
Place based on center of footprint (ignoring what layers?)
Place based on center of pin 1
Place based on center of all pins
Place based on top/bottom left/right corner
…
Describe alternatives you've considered
Changing the footprints
Surely an option for custom footprints but not ideal for standard-parts (e.g. Connector_USB:USB_C_Receptacle_G-Switch_GT-USB-7010ASV vs. C963370)
Moving the parts in the placement preview when ordering
Works but can easily be forgotten. Especially for parts like the mentioned USB-C connector where the offset is small.
Additional context
-/-
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Some footprints I use result in the parts being placed rotated and with a offset in the JLCPCB placement preview.
For rotation, there is a setting in the plugin but for position offsets, there isn’t (as far as I can tell).
Describe the solution you'd like
I’d like to have the option to store a offset that should be used when adding a part to the POS file. Just like the rotation.
Specifying an offset as a relative value (move by dx/dy) would be fine.
Of course there could be other options that simplify the entry:
Describe alternatives you've considered
Surely an option for custom footprints but not ideal for standard-parts (e.g. Connector_USB:USB_C_Receptacle_G-Switch_GT-USB-7010ASV vs. C963370)
Works but can easily be forgotten. Especially for parts like the mentioned USB-C connector where the offset is small.
Additional context
-/-
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: