Performance and Reliability

[mervegrbz]

Performance and Reliability section in the requierements should be written clearly to the requirements page

[bgmrsln]

I have added the following requirements:

• 2.4.1. Response time: The system should respond to user requests within 5 seconds.
• 2.4.2. Throughput: The system should be able to handle a minimum of 500 concurrent users.
• 2.4.3. User Accounts: The platform shall support at least 5000 user accounts.
• 2.4.4. Fault Tolerance: The system should be designed to recover quickly from any failure, and data should not be lost during failures.
• 2.4.5. Capacity: The system should be designed to handle a large volume of data and user requests without any slowdowns.
• 2.4.6. Data integrity: The system should ensure that all data stored is accurate, complete, and consistent.
  I used should for performance so as not to burden. Also I am not sure how much performance is expected from us. Can you review it? @mervegrbz

[mervegrbz]

I think, response time and capacity explains our main goal. But the app can have a serious traffic in the first moments of disasters, So having a scalable server is a must for us. We need data to measure user traffic of disaster websites so I am not sure, neither 😢. Ellerine sağlıkkk 🚀

[mehmetkuzu]

We can add a requirements in should form (even shall) to backup the server operation.

2.4.7. Backup servers for availability: All servers (application servers, database servers etc) should have a backup in different locations. A real time mirroring of these parallel servers should be a requirement.

Reason for this: Disasters might occur in such a way that our server is also affected.

[bgmrsln]

We can add a requirements in should form (even shall) to backup the server operation.

2.4.7. Backup servers for availability: All servers (application servers, database servers etc) should have a backup in different locations. A real time mirroring of these parallel servers should be a requirement.

Reason for this: Disasters might occur in such a way that our server is also affected.

I thought of it but I think it should be inside Backup and Recovery

[mehmetkuzu]

@egecans we talked about that in the closs.
Actually it is about Availability. So Egecan will add it there.

[mehmetkuzu]

@egecans I guess "should" is enough for this. (Not shall)