Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[question] Cross server schematics folder #1194

Closed
TomLewis opened this issue Nov 9, 2018 · 2 comments
Closed

[question] Cross server schematics folder #1194

TomLewis opened this issue Nov 9, 2018 · 2 comments

Comments

@TomLewis
Copy link

TomLewis commented Nov 9, 2018

Can multiple servers on the same machine share the same schematics folder? So schematics between servers can be used.

Second question, Could this somehow be saved to Bungee to have servers on separate machines share the same schematics folder saved on the bungee?

@masterX244
Copy link

On default worldedit i used symlinks for the first case. Maybe somethign with a mounted share can be done for second case

@NotMyFault
Copy link
Collaborator

Your ticket has been closed because it falls into one of the following categories:

  • Your issue has been fixed in a newer version of FastAsyncWorldEdit for versions 1.8 - 1.12.2, get the latest build here matching the platform you need.

  • Your issue targets minecraft version 1.13 or higher. This is the wrong repository then. Move to this repository and open a bug report here.
    BUT BEWARE: You should consider updating to 1.15.2, using the latest Fawe build for 1.15.2 (Build 255 when writing this, get it here) and reproducing the issue in a clean environment (fresh setup Spigot or Paper server).

  • Your issue has been fixed in a build of FAWE for 1.15 or an issue exists on our new repository.

  • You either didn't fill out the template or deleted it.

If none of the bullet points suits, head to the second one.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants