You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I wonder why the osbib parser does obviously not parse certain tags.
For example, the ArXiv tags are primaryClass, eprint, archive and archivePrefix.
techreport{bla1,
title = "haha",
author = "blub",
institution = "bla",
number = "1",
year = "2015",
archive = "",
archivePrefix = "ArXiv",
eprint = "12345.1234",
primaryClass = "cs.HC"
}
despite the standard tags, eprint is the only one which is parsed correctly, but archive, primaryClass and archivePrefix are not - so @archive@ is always empty, but @Eprint@ is ok. I don't really get why... I added artificial entries like abcd, abcde and so on to abcdefghijklmn and they get parsed correctly...
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Just an example: http://www.arth.co.at/?page_id=15
If you look at the bibtex source, the fields are all there; still, the way I create this reference now is a hack in ieee.tpl, doing something like this:
I wonder why the osbib parser does obviously not parse certain tags.
For example, the ArXiv tags are primaryClass, eprint, archive and archivePrefix.
techreport{bla1,
title = "haha",
author = "blub",
institution = "bla",
number = "1",
year = "2015",
archive = "",
archivePrefix = "ArXiv",
eprint = "12345.1234",
primaryClass = "cs.HC"
}
despite the standard tags, eprint is the only one which is parsed correctly, but archive, primaryClass and archivePrefix are not - so @archive@ is always empty, but @Eprint@ is ok. I don't really get why... I added artificial entries like abcd, abcde and so on to abcdefghijklmn and they get parsed correctly...
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: