Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Spike: The decision table layout is a crucial part for understandability of the tables #477

Closed
pinussilvestrus opened this issue Feb 20, 2020 · 7 comments

Comments

@pinussilvestrus
Copy link
Contributor

pinussilvestrus commented Feb 20, 2020

What should we do?

Investigate the following hypothesis: "The decision table layout is a crucial part for understandability of the tables", cf. DMN Hypothesis Board

Why should we do it?

After we investigated possible ways to view and edit deeper decision logic inside DRDs (cf. #451), we want to have a look at the decision tables now. Decoupled from the current layout we want to investigate different approaches for layouting so that the user can easily understand the logic of a table.

Summary

Resources

@pinussilvestrus
Copy link
Contributor Author

We start to find ideas for the decision table header layout, cf. Sketches

@pinussilvestrus
Copy link
Contributor Author

We came up with the following layout approach

FINAL

Next Step: We will create a first prototype on how to navigate between DRD and Decision Tables with this new layout

IMG_20200226_145820

@pinussilvestrus
Copy link
Contributor Author

We came up with the following navigation demo (changes to be made)

Kapture 2020-03-04 at 14 18 32

@pinussilvestrus
Copy link
Contributor Author

User Tests

@pinussilvestrus
Copy link
Contributor Author

User Test 6th of March (1)

image

@pinussilvestrus
Copy link
Contributor Author

User Test 6th of March (2)

image

@pinussilvestrus
Copy link
Contributor Author

We going to test the demo in the next weeks again. Generally, we know what we want to achieve with the split screen and the basic table layout.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant