You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
First of all, thank you so much for the new release with BPMN-Properties-Panel. It's an excellent addition.
I am almost at the end of testing phase to integrate bpmn-server in our project. I simply adore this node based server engine. It saved me a great deal of effort for our project. Thank you so much for your excellent contribution @ralphhanna. Greatly appreciated!
I have a clarification regarding the service task configuration.
Is configuring implementation through properties panel (like below) not enough?
Do I also have to edit the BPMN directly to add implementation property for service tasks!? It seems to be this case.
Is it supposed to be this way? It's just that all other configurations could be done through the panel except this. Seems like an odd one out.
Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
MaheshkumarSundaram
changed the title
Clarification regarding configuring service task through properties panel
Clarification regarding configuring service task
Aug 31, 2022
Using version 1.3.1
Hi,
First of all, thank you so much for the new release with
BPMN-Properties-Panel
. It's an excellent addition.I am almost at the end of testing phase to integrate
bpmn-server
in our project. I simply adore this node based server engine. It saved me a great deal of effort for our project. Thank you so much for your excellent contribution @ralphhanna. Greatly appreciated!I have a clarification regarding the service task configuration.
Is configuring
implementation
through properties panel (like below) not enough?Do I also have to edit the BPMN directly to add
implementation
property for service tasks!? It seems to be this case.Is it supposed to be this way? It's just that all other configurations could be done through the panel except this. Seems like an odd one out.
Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: