-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 173
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Adding SPARCNet and ContraWR #611
Adding SPARCNet and ContraWR #611
Conversation
fyi @mccorsi |
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #611 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 86.93% 87.20% +0.26%
==========================================
Files 65 67 +2
Lines 5796 5925 +129
==========================================
+ Hits 5039 5167 +128
- Misses 757 758 +1 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
at some point it would be good to do a full evaluation of all these architectures on a some standard datasets
Co-authored-by: Alexandre Gramfort <alexandre.gramfort@m4x.org>
…nnels and out_channels, as much as possible).
The green button is yours @agramfort |
In Biot's article, in addition to the BIOT model, the author centralizes codes from other models.
The list is:
In this PR, I am proposing to implement 1) SPaRCNet and 2) ContraWR.