inline doesn't need to be documented

[cjdb]

inline isn't a part of the interface, so including it as a part of the API documentation adds noise (especially when something is marked constexpr, which implies inline anyway).

[vermeeren]

@cjdb In some way yes, in another way showing things exactly as-is I feel is good for transparency. Could add a global Breathe configuration option to hide inline, though it might also be added by Sphinx's C/C++ domain, I'm not sure.

Patches welcome!

[cjdb]

This looks fairly straightforward to patch, ETA tomorrow :)

[emilydolson]

Any progress on this? I just updated Breath and Sphinx and suddenly I've got inlines everywhere. I'd love to get rid of them (and I think its also possible some of them are erroneous, but I'm not sure).

[cjdb]

I have a local patch, but I'm going to wait until #918 is merged before making further contributions.