New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Linter complains about valid BEM #335
Comments
Using this sample from http://csswizardry.com/2013/01/mindbemding-getting-your-head-round-bem-syntax/:
I am seeing:
Looks like we are doing BEM all wrong. |
No actually Harry here is advocating a BEM syntax which is not the standard (although that's the one I use too). To lint according to this article's syntax you need to set Hence this at the end of the article:
|
According to @csswizardry on http://cssguidelin.es/#bem-like-naming The convention is:
According to BEM developers on (http://bem.info/tools/bem/bem-naming/):
I have this in my config:
|
Duplicate of #319 |
somehow the linter is complaining about this classname:
.table__row--align-top
I configured the linter to enforce BEM class names, but according to this (http://csswizardry.com/2013/01/mindbemding-getting-your-head-round-bem-syntax/) article it should. Any idea what's going wrong?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: