-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
/
dAPA_Conservation.Rmd
271 lines (168 loc) · 8.81 KB
/
dAPA_Conservation.Rmd
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
---
title: "Conservation Questions"
author: "Briana Mittleman"
date: "2/28/2020"
output: html_document
---
```{r setup, include=FALSE}
knitr::opts_chunk$set(echo = TRUE)
```
In my initial exploration of dAPA PAS I saw they are enriched for negative phylop scores. I will explore this trend further here. I will see if intron location explain the differences.
```{r}
library(tidyverse)
library(ggpubr)
library(reshape2)
```
```{r}
DiffUsage=read.table("../data/DiffIso_Nuclear_DF/SignifianceEitherPAS_2_Nuclear.txt", header = T, stringsAsFactors = F)
PASMeta=read.table("../data/PAS_doubleFilter/PAS_10perc_either_HumanCoord_BothUsage_meta_doubleFilter.txt", header = T, stringsAsFactors = F) %>% dplyr::select(PAS, chr, start,end, gene, loc)
DiffUsagePAS=DiffUsage %>% inner_join(PASMeta, by=c("gene","chr", "start", "end"))
```
```{r}
phylores=read.table("../data/PhyloP/PAS_phyloP.txt", col.names = c("chr","start","end", "phyloP"), stringsAsFactors = F) %>% drop_na()
NucReswPhy=read.table("../data/DiffIso_Nuclear_DF/AllPAS_withGeneSig.txt", header = T, stringsAsFactors = F) %>% inner_join(phylores, by=c("chr","start","end"))
```
40756 have results of the 40776
```{r}
ggplot(NucReswPhy,aes(y=phyloP, x=SigPAU2,fill=SigPAU2)) + geom_boxplot() + stat_compare_means()+ scale_fill_brewer(palette = "Dark2", name="Signficant")
```
```{r}
ggplot(NucReswPhy,aes(x=phyloP, by=SigPAU2, fill=SigPAU2)) + geom_density(alpha=.5) + scale_fill_brewer(palette = "Dark2", name="Signficant PAS") + labs(title="Mean PhyloP scores for tested PAS") + annotate("text",label="Wilcoxan, p=1.4e -5",x=6,y=.75)
```
The significant PAS have on average lower phyloP scores.
Positive scores — Measure conservation, which is slower evolution than expected, at sites that are predicted to be conserved.
Negative scores — Measure acceleration, which is faster evolution than expected, at sites that are predicted to be fast-evolving.
I can look at those with negative values:
```{r}
x=nrow(NucReswPhy %>% filter(SigPAU2=="Yes", phyloP<0))
m= nrow(NucReswPhy %>% filter(phyloP<0))
n=nrow(NucReswPhy %>% filter(phyloP>=0))
k=nrow(NucReswPhy %>% filter(SigPAU2=="Yes"))
#expected
which(grepl(max(dhyper(1:x, m, n, k)), dhyper(1:x, m, n, k)))
#actual:
x
#pval
phyper(x,m,n,k,lower.tail=F)
```
```{r}
b=nrow(NucReswPhy %>% filter(SigPAU2=="Yes", phyloP<0))
n=nrow(NucReswPhy %>% filter(SigPAU2=="Yes"))
B=nrow(NucReswPhy %>% filter(phyloP<0))
N=nrow(NucReswPhy)
(b/n)/(B/N)
```
This means these regions are more likely to be fast evolving.
Look at this by location: (is it driven by region)
```{r}
NucReswPhy_meta= NucReswPhy %>% inner_join(PASMeta, by=c("chr", "start", "end", "gene"))
ggplot(NucReswPhy_meta,aes(x=phyloP, by=SigPAU2, fill=SigPAU2)) + geom_density(alpha=.5) + scale_fill_brewer(palette = "Dark2") + facet_grid(~loc)
```
```{r}
NucReswPhy_meta_group=NucReswPhy_meta %>% group_by(loc,SigPAU2) %>% summarise(n=n(),meanPhylo=mean(phyloP))
NucReswPhy_meta_group
```
##Control sequence (upstream 200):
Look at the 200 basepairs upstream of each PAS as a control.
```{r}
metaStrand=read.table("../data/PAS_doubleFilter/PAS_10perc_either_HumanCoord_BothUsage_meta_doubleFilter.txt", header = T, stringsAsFactors = F) %>% select(chr, start,end, strandFix, PAS)
NucReswPhy_upstream=NucReswPhy %>% inner_join(metaStrand,by=c("chr", "start", "end")) %>% mutate(newStart=ifelse(strandFix=="+", start - 200, end), newEnd=ifelse(strandFix=="+", start, end +200))
NucReswPhy_upstreambed=NucReswPhy_upstream %>% select(chr, newStart, newEnd, PAS, Human, strandFix)
write.table(NucReswPhy_upstreambed,"../data/PhyloP/PAS_200upregions.bed",col.names = F,row.names = F,quote = F,sep="\t")
```
```{bash,eval=F}
python extractPhylopReg200up.py
```
```{r}
Phylo200UpContron=read.table("../data/PhyloP/PAS_phyloP_200upstream.txt",stringsAsFactors = F, col.names = c("chr", "start","end", "PAS","UpstreamControl_Phylop"))
NucReswPhyandC=read.table("../data/DiffIso_Nuclear_DF/AllPAS_withGeneSig.txt", header = T, stringsAsFactors = F) %>% inner_join(phylores, by=c("chr", "start","end")) %>% inner_join(metaStrand,by=c("chr", "start", "end"))%>% inner_join(Phylo200UpContron, by="PAS") %>% drop_na()
NucReswPhyandCsmall=NucReswPhyandC %>% select(PAS,SigPAU2,phyloP ,UpstreamControl_Phylop ) %>% gather("set", "Phylop", -PAS, -SigPAU2)
wilcox.test(NucReswPhyandC$phyloP, NucReswPhyandC$UpstreamControl_Phylop, alternative = "greater")
```
Actual are greater than region upstream
```{r}
ggplot(NucReswPhyandCsmall, aes(x=SigPAU2, by=set, fill=set, y=Phylop)) + geom_boxplot() + scale_fill_brewer(palette = "Dark2",labels=c('PAS', 'Control') ) + stat_compare_means()
```
```{r}
NucReswPhyandCsmall_noc= NucReswPhyandCsmall %>% filter(set!="UpstreamControl_Phylop")
ggplot(NucReswPhyandCsmall_noc, aes(x=SigPAU2, fill=SigPAU2, y=Phylop )) + geom_boxplot() + stat_compare_means() + scale_fill_brewer(palette = "Dark2")
```
Significant are lower than not significant:
```{r}
NucReswPhyandCsmall_nocYES= NucReswPhyandCsmall_noc %>% filter(SigPAU2=="Yes")
NucReswPhyandCsmall_nocNO= NucReswPhyandCsmall_noc %>% filter(SigPAU2=="No")
wilcox.test(NucReswPhyandCsmall_nocYES$Phylop, NucReswPhyandCsmall_nocNO$Phylop, alternative ="less")
```
Significant have lower scores.
Number of negative in each set?
```{r}
neg=NucReswPhyandCsmall %>% filter(Phylop <0) %>% group_by(set, SigPAU2) %>% summarise(nNeg=n())
pos=NucReswPhyandCsmall %>% filter(Phylop >0) %>% group_by(set, SigPAU2) %>% summarise(nPos=n())
both=neg %>% inner_join(pos,by= c('set', 'SigPAU2')) %>% mutate(PropNeg=nNeg/(nNeg+nPos))
both
```
More negative overall in actual. Is there an enrichment for negative in the control set?
```{r}
x=nrow(NucReswPhyandC %>% filter(SigPAU2=="Yes", UpstreamControl_Phylop<0))
m= nrow(NucReswPhyandC %>% filter(UpstreamControl_Phylop<0))
n=nrow(NucReswPhyandC %>% filter(UpstreamControl_Phylop>=0))
k=nrow(NucReswPhyandC %>% filter(SigPAU2=="Yes"))
#expected
which(grepl(max(dhyper(1:x, m, n, k)), dhyper(1:x, m, n, k)))
#actual:
x
#pval
phyper(x,m,n,k,lower.tail=F)
```
```{r}
b=nrow(NucReswPhyandC %>% filter(SigPAU2=="Yes", UpstreamControl_Phylop<0))
n=nrow(NucReswPhyandC %>% filter(SigPAU2=="Yes"))
B=nrow(NucReswPhyandC %>% filter(UpstreamControl_Phylop<0))
N=nrow(NucReswPhyandC)
(b/n)/(B/N)
```
Stronger enrichement in the for negative in the real results compared to contol.
1.07x in control 1.11x in actual.
Maybe I need to move the control further up.
Is this a better control? Dont want to go into an exon? What about downstream?
##Control sequence (downstream 200):
```{r}
NucReswPhy_downstream=NucReswPhy %>% inner_join(metaStrand,by=c("chr", "start", "end")) %>% mutate(newStart=ifelse(strandFix=="+", end, start-200), newEnd=ifelse(strandFix=="+", end+200, start))
NucReswPhy_downstreambed=NucReswPhy_downstream %>% select(chr, newStart, newEnd, PAS, Human, strandFix)
write.table(NucReswPhy_downstreambed,"../data/PhyloP/PAS_200downpregions.bed",col.names = F,row.names = F,quote = F,sep="\t")
```
```{bash,eval=F}
python extractPhylopReg200down.py
```
```{r}
Phylo200downCont=read.table("../data/PhyloP/PAS_phyloP_200downstream.txt",stringsAsFactors = F, col.names = c("chr", "start","end", "PAS","DownstreamControl_Phylop"))
NucReswPhyandbothC=read.table("../data/DiffIso_Nuclear_DF/AllPAS_withGeneSig.txt", header = T, stringsAsFactors = F) %>% inner_join(phylores, by=c("chr", "start","end")) %>% inner_join(metaStrand,by=c("chr", "start", "end"))%>% inner_join(Phylo200UpContron, by="PAS") %>% drop_na() %>% inner_join(Phylo200downCont, by="PAS") %>% drop_na()
NucReswPhyandCbothsmall=NucReswPhyandbothC %>% select(PAS,SigPAU2,phyloP ,UpstreamControl_Phylop,DownstreamControl_Phylop ) %>% gather("set", "Phylop", -PAS, -SigPAU2)
#difference in controls?
wilcox.test(NucReswPhyandbothC$DownstreamControl_Phylop, NucReswPhyandbothC$UpstreamControl_Phylop,alternative = "greater")
```
```{r}
ggplot(NucReswPhyandCbothsmall, aes(x=SigPAU2, by=set, fill=set, y=Phylop)) + geom_boxplot() + scale_fill_brewer(palette = "Dark2",labels=c("Downstream Control", "PAS", "Upstream Control") )
```
Same here. The actual region looks more conserved.
Enrichemnt for negative in this control:
```{r}
x=nrow(NucReswPhyandbothC %>% filter(SigPAU2=="Yes", DownstreamControl_Phylop<0))
m= nrow(NucReswPhyandbothC %>% filter(DownstreamControl_Phylop<0))
n=nrow(NucReswPhyandbothC %>% filter(DownstreamControl_Phylop>=0))
k=nrow(NucReswPhyandbothC %>% filter(SigPAU2=="Yes"))
#expected
which(grepl(max(dhyper(1:x, m, n, k)), dhyper(1:x, m, n, k)))
#actual:
x
#pval
phyper(x,m,n,k,lower.tail=F)
```
```{r}
b=nrow(NucReswPhyandbothC %>% filter(SigPAU2=="Yes", DownstreamControl_Phylop<0))
n=nrow(NucReswPhyandbothC %>% filter(SigPAU2=="Yes"))
B=nrow(NucReswPhyandbothC %>% filter(DownstreamControl_Phylop<0))
N=nrow(NucReswPhyandbothC)
(b/n)/(B/N)
```
Most enrichment for negative in this set. Maybe an annotation bias still.