You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently, if more than one attribute is missing or wrong, which attribute is reported as problematic depends on the order the attribute shows up in the attribute pair list.
> Recent bug fixes in the development version of R,
> "R-devel", (see the short thread starting here:
> https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-devel/2018-March/075644.html
> ) have lead your packages to no longer pass 'R CMD
> check' with that version of R-devel:
> https://www.r-project.org/web/checks/check_results_nima.html
> https://www.r-project.org/web/checks/check_results_vetr.html
> In both cases, the reason is a *too strict* test, you not
> only check that the attributes (of a certain data frame)
> are correct, but you *wrongly* also check that the list
> which attributes(<df>) returns has the attributes in a
> given order.
> Instead please fix your check e.g., to use identical() if
> appropriate, because even identical() with its default
> argument 'attr.as.set = TRUE' does *not* distinguish
> objects where only the attributes are re-ordered.
> Best regards,
> Martin Maechler ETH Zurich and R Core Team
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Currently, if more than one attribute is missing or wrong, which attribute is reported as problematic depends on the order the attribute shows up in the attribute pair list.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: