-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 28
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Installing without siteconf.py leads to error. #1
Comments
I've rerun the above with the verbose option. Here's the compilation command used by Codepy:
For comparison, here are the commands with a build using
From the looks of it, the only significant different I can see is that when using the
No luck, I get the same error message as before. I do get a slightly different compilation command:
It now looks almost identical to the working command; the missing |
Thanks for the report. I've updated the build process significantly - I hope the new script catches the lack of configuration before building. |
Issue no longer present in most recent version of Copperhead. |
Thanks for the report! |
Despite have
boost_python
installed in the default location, I am unable to compile any Copperhead code after installation. During installation, it seems to find the boost libraries. I do get:Which leads me to believe that it knows where to look to find the
boost_python
libraries. However, if I try to run theaxpy.py
sample I get:The compiler appears to have difficult locating the correct boost libraries. Installing with a
siteconf.py
containing:solves the issue. For comparison, the generated
siteconf.py
looks like this:Perhaps having the generated
siteconf.py
fill in the default locations instead would work.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: