Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[REACT] Jest tests for Bryntum components #7877

Open
SergeyMaltsev opened this issue Nov 16, 2023 · 6 comments
Open

[REACT] Jest tests for Bryntum components #7877

SergeyMaltsev opened this issue Nov 16, 2023 · 6 comments
Labels
forum Issues from forum high-priority Urgent to have fixed large-account Reported by large customer OEM OEM customer

Comments

@SergeyMaltsev
Copy link
Contributor

Forum post

Investigate the possibility to test Bryntum products with Jest.

@SergeyMaltsev SergeyMaltsev added forum Issues from forum large-account Reported by large customer OEM OEM customer labels Nov 16, 2023
@SergeyMaltsev SergeyMaltsev self-assigned this Nov 16, 2023
@chuckn0rris
Copy link

Antoher request

@jamesonhill
Copy link

Sorry to "+1" this, but it's a pretty substantial limitation.

@marciogurka
Copy link

+1 for this

@AndrewPerera
Copy link

+1 for this. The majority uses jest with RTL

1 similar comment
@AbeykoonOshan
Copy link

+1 for this. The majority uses jest with RTL

@matsbryntse
Copy link
Member

matsbryntse commented Mar 21, 2024

Does the non-trial version include ESM modules of the components? We want to cover it in our unit tests with Jest, but we’re facing javascript module loading issues. The issues appear grossly unrelated to the DOM comments we’ve seen online.

If there is a way for us to get the ESM modules so we can just load and render and do so at our own risk, we’d be thrilled.

@matsbryntse matsbryntse added the high-priority Urgent to have fixed label Mar 21, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
forum Issues from forum high-priority Urgent to have fixed large-account Reported by large customer OEM OEM customer
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

7 participants