Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Document resourceAvatarClick and resourceAvatarOverflowClick events #8678

Closed
ghulamghousdev opened this issue Feb 23, 2024 · 0 comments
Closed
Assignees
Labels
docs Improvements or additions to documentation forum Issues from forum large-account Reported by large customer OEM OEM customer premium resolved Fixed but not yet released (available in the nightly builds)
Milestone

Comments

@ghulamghousdev
Copy link
Member

Forum post

Hi,

We've noticed you fire resourceAvatarClick and resourceAvatarOverflowClick events in the source code but they aren't documented. They're potentially very useful to us. Also, they have resourceRecord in the event payload but it is always undefined.

Would it be possible to fix the resourceRecord property and document them as available?

@ghulamghousdev ghulamghousdev added premium docs Improvements or additions to documentation forum Issues from forum large-account Reported by large customer OEM OEM customer labels Feb 23, 2024
@matsbryntse matsbryntse self-assigned this Feb 25, 2024
@matsbryntse matsbryntse added ready for review Issue is fixed, the pull request is being reviewed resolved Fixed but not yet released (available in the nightly builds) and removed ready for review Issue is fixed, the pull request is being reviewed labels Feb 25, 2024
@SergeyMaltsev SergeyMaltsev added this to the 5.6.8 milestone Mar 4, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
docs Improvements or additions to documentation forum Issues from forum large-account Reported by large customer OEM OEM customer premium resolved Fixed but not yet released (available in the nightly builds)
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants