Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

the default is now .nodeshift to put your resource files in #20

Conversation

lholmquist
Copy link
Member

@lholmquist lholmquist commented Jun 8, 2017

Also, there is a better error message if there isn't a .nodeshift directory

connects to #19

just want to add a test to this also

Also, there is a better error message if there isn't a .nodeshift directory

connects to nodeshift#19
@ghost ghost assigned lholmquist Jun 8, 2017
@ghost ghost added the in progress label Jun 8, 2017
@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Jun 8, 2017

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 96.552% when pulling 595531b on lholmquist:19-no-nodeshift-dir-no-problem-change-to-.nodeshift into 52a858e on bucharest-gold:master.

fixes nodeshift#19.

* also pass the options to the resource loader to specify a different .nodeshift folder name and use the options projectLocation prop
@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Jun 9, 2017

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+2.2%) to 98.78% when pulling 1c9bec4 on lholmquist:19-no-nodeshift-dir-no-problem-change-to-.nodeshift into 52a858e on bucharest-gold:master.

@lholmquist lholmquist merged commit 1c9bec4 into nodeshift:master Jun 9, 2017
@ghost ghost removed the in progress label Jun 9, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants