You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
As is, complying with CT 4.1.7.1.1.2 and .3 does not implicitly provide compliance with CT 4.1.7.1.1.1.
Is it intended that the RepresentationIdentifier for the horizontal geometry only be different?
If this is just a documentation discrepancy, should "FootPrint" be changed to "Axis" in the vertical and cant CTs, or should "Axis" be changed to "FootPrint" in the horizontal only CT?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Looking at concept templates 4.1.7.1.1.1 Alignment Geometry - Horizontal and 4.1.7.1.1.2 Alignment Geometry - Horizontal and Vertical, the RepresentationIdentifier for the IfcCompositeCurve in the Horizontal case is
Axis
and it isFootPrint
for the Horizontal and Vertical case.Taken at face value, that would mean for Alignment Geometry - Horizontal and Vertical IfcAlignment.Representation.Representations must equal 3.
The same is true for CT 4.1.7.1.1.3 Alignment Geometry - Horizontal, Vertical, and Cant
As is, complying with CT 4.1.7.1.1.2 and .3 does not implicitly provide compliance with CT 4.1.7.1.1.1.
Is it intended that the RepresentationIdentifier for the horizontal geometry only be different?
If this is just a documentation discrepancy, should "FootPrint" be changed to "Axis" in the vertical and cant CTs, or should "Axis" be changed to "FootPrint" in the horizontal only CT?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: