Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Different format/codec support from MediaInfo #6

Closed
SaintFlipper opened this issue Feb 13, 2017 · 1 comment
Closed

Different format/codec support from MediaInfo #6

SaintFlipper opened this issue Feb 13, 2017 · 1 comment

Comments

@SaintFlipper
Copy link

Noticing that mediainfo.js fails to extract information for some common (?) file types which MediaInfo displays full information for. For example all mediainfo.js displays for this .mov file:
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/36771332/P1010596.MOV
is
Format QuickTime
Format Info Original Apple specifications
and for this .mp4 file:
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/36771332/HEALTH-ECIGARETTES-USA.MP4
Format MPEG-4
Format profile Base Media / Version 2
Codec ID mp42 (mp42/mp41)
whereas MediaInfo displays full video and audio details for both.

From casual observation it looks like .mov files with format=MPEG-4 are fully decoded by mediainfo.js but those with format=QuickTime are not. Similarly .mp4 files with a codec ID that includes "isom" are fully decoded, but those with codec ID including "mp42" are not.

Has mediainfo.js been built with only a subset of the formats and codec support which MediaInfo has? Alternatively how to go about finding why these files (and many others) are not fully handled by mediainfo.js ? Are there any debug options that can be enabled, for example, which might provide useful diagnostic info?

@buzz buzz added the duplicate label Feb 13, 2017
@buzz
Copy link
Owner

buzz commented Feb 13, 2017

Dupe of #4.

The file is correctly parsed if you set a bigger chunk size as suggested in the referenced issue.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants