Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Support other signals for +stop-signal and/or document alternatives #230

Closed
eldipa opened this issue May 6, 2022 · 0 comments · Fixed by #231
Closed

Support other signals for +stop-signal and/or document alternatives #230

eldipa opened this issue May 6, 2022 · 0 comments · Fixed by #231
Labels
enhancement something nice to have but it is not neither critical nor urgent
Milestone
10.5.2

Comments

@eldipa
Copy link
Collaborator

eldipa commented May 6, 2022

Describe the feature you'd like
Currently we support interrupt (^C), eof (^D) and suspend (^Z) but there are others control sequences and signals that we could send. SIGTERM and SIGKILL are the ones that come to my mind.

However sending signals may be tricky/dangerous because if the control-sequence/signal is received by the shell, it may close it by accident.

So we need to document what alternatives we have in case +stop-signal is not enough.
@eldipa eldipa added the enhancement something nice to have but it is not neither critical nor urgent label May 6, 2022
@eldipa eldipa added this to the 10.5.2 milestone May 6, 2022
@eldipa eldipa mentioned this issue May 6, 2022
Merged
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
enhancement something nice to have but it is not neither critical nor urgent
Projects
None yet
Milestone
10.5.2
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

Issue 230 more signals to stop byexamples/byexample
1 participant
@eldipa