Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

New memory index —— HashMap #99

Closed
qishenonly opened this issue Jun 13, 2023 · 7 comments
Closed

New memory index —— HashMap #99

qishenonly opened this issue Jun 13, 2023 · 7 comments
Assignees
Labels
difficult:⭐⭐⭐ Up to five stars

Comments

@qishenonly
Copy link
Member

We need a new in-memory index, HashMap, to allow users to choose the index that is more efficient for the business during development.

@qishenonly qishenonly added the difficult:⭐⭐⭐ Up to five stars label Jun 13, 2023
@lim-yoona
Copy link
Contributor

May I try this issue?

@qishenonly
Copy link
Member Author

May I try this issue?我可以试试这个问题吗?

OK,try to do it.

qishenonly added a commit that referenced this issue Jul 6, 2023
Add HashMap in-memory index for FlyDB(#99)
@qishenonly
Copy link
Member Author

What is the minimum version of go required for the third-party library of hashmap you are using?

@lim-yoona
Copy link
Contributor

What is the minimum version of go required for the third-party library of hashmap you are using?

The minimal supported Golang version is 1.19 as it makes use of Generics and the new atomic package helpers.

@qishenonly
Copy link
Member Author

image
Hashmap memory index is having problems running TestPutAndGet tests, waiting for no result. Consider fixing this problem and testing the performance of hashmap.

@lim-yoona
Copy link
Contributor

image Hashmap memory index is having problems running TestPutAndGet tests, waiting for no result. Consider fixing this problem and testing the performance of hashmap.

OK, I will try.

@qishenonly
Copy link
Member Author

image Hashmap memory index is having problems running TestPutAndGet tests, waiting for no result. Consider fixing this problem and testing the performance of hashmap.

OK, I will try.

I'll comment your hashmap test code first to avoid further development by our development team. A problem with the iterator for Hashmap prevents the test method TestPutAndGet from testing performance.

saeid-a pushed a commit to saeid-a/FlyDB that referenced this issue Jul 12, 2023
CrazyJius pushed a commit that referenced this issue Jul 12, 2023
Add HashMap in-memory index for FlyDB(#99)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
difficult:⭐⭐⭐ Up to five stars
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants