Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

OpenMPI module and desire to provide newer version testing #332

Open
tatarsky opened this issue Oct 20, 2015 · 10 comments
Open

OpenMPI module and desire to provide newer version testing #332

tatarsky opened this issue Oct 20, 2015 · 10 comments
Assignees

Comments

@tatarsky
Copy link
Contributor

There are two OpenMPI modules on the system compared to the MPICH2 stack.

openmpi-x86_64    which is a 1.5.4 version
openmpi_eth/1.6.3  which is a 1.6.3 version

I believe most folks actually use the MPICH2 module for MPI or have their own OpenMPI build.

However, I would like to at least provide a recent module (stable is v1.10.0) for OpenMPI and then REMOVE these two dated modules from the system.

Does anyone care? And if you care because you are using the above modules, are you willing to work with me on testing said new module?

I will not alter either module during said efforts.

@tatarsky
Copy link
Contributor Author

I am taking it by the silence nobody uses OpenMPI modules on the Hal cluster. I will be adding a latest version module as a non-default to be safe. But if I do not see "Yes, I use this module" in say a week or so, I will be removing the older modules.

@tatarsky
Copy link
Contributor Author

Does this support interest anyone?
https://www.open-mpi.org/faq/?category=buildcuda

@jchodera
Copy link
Member

My group uses userspace-installed MPI installed via the conda package manager instead of root-level-installed MPI modules:

I do agree that having a functional MPI module would be a good idea. I have traditionally used MPICH, but there shouldn't be a big difference between the two except in the way they are executed (which we would probably want to briefly document).

@jchodera
Copy link
Member

I don't know of any software currently in use that utilizes the CUDA-aware MPI features you mention, though this looks interesting.

@tatarsky
Copy link
Contributor Author

I'll build it for kicks. I don't think anyone is using OpenMPI from these modules.

@tatarsky tatarsky self-assigned this Nov 3, 2015
@polykrates
Copy link

If there is still interest in a newer OpenMPI module:
We actually need a version > 1.10 for running CNTK.
Best, Thomas

@jchodera
Copy link
Member

jchodera commented Jul 29, 2016 via email

@polykrates
Copy link

I was just compiling my own, but conda seems comfortable.
Naive questions: By using conda would the install be restricted to Python or is it a general setup-tool?

@jchodera
Copy link
Member

jchodera commented Jul 29, 2016 via email

@polykrates
Copy link

Sounds great. I will give it a try.
Thanks a lot John!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants